Stanford’s war on social life
palladiummag.com
Stanford’s war on social life
1–10 of 402 posts
Re: Stanford’s war on social life
#2https://us9.campaign-archive.com/?u=c9d7a555374df02a66219b57...
Details on the cancellation of the JV marching band.
Re: Stanford’s war on social life
#3Re: Stanford’s war on social life
#4[flagged]
Did the non-white male students call for these changes, or is it part of the corporate agenda of disrupting strong social networks and bonds?
Re: Stanford’s war on social life
#5[flagged]
Re: Stanford’s war on social life
#6[flagged]
Probably more than anywhere I see this in athletics with boys and girls. Certain Dad’s of boys complain about how when they were boys they could do all these things that are now off limits because they say girls complain about them. I’m not sure the girls feel the same way.
Re: Stanford’s war on social life
#7[flagged]
Re: Stanford’s war on social life
#8I know that some people who got a lot out of Greek Life equate it with Social Life, but most college students don't pledge/rush and it doesn't get in the way of social life. There are plenty of ways to socialize without frats.
Re: Stanford’s war on social life
#9Linked from the article: https://us9.campaign-archive.com/?u=c9d7a555374df02a66219b57... Details on the cancellation of the JV marching band.
Re: Stanford’s war on social life
#10Simple: Stanford should be held responsible for the impact their actions, that here directly caused harm to an endangered species.
Either they did lie before, about the salamander (then they're on the hook for lying for material gains) or showed negligence after, causing the draught.
In either case, neither the truth nor endangered species are acceptable casualties in Stanford ongoing war against its own students.