Live data from Hacker News

Official IE11 end-of-life in 2 days

death-to-ie11.com

31–40 of 57 posts

Re: Official IE11 end-of-life in 2 days

#31
post #18
post #3

Great news! What is the next big piece of software that needs to be retired to make the Internet a better place?

I guess in the spirit of the open web, Chrome might be a good candidate for retirement. There is even a growing consensus that "Chrome is the new IE".

Nimble Storage devices warn you if you try to administer them with Firefox instead of Chrome.

Re: Official IE11 end-of-life in 2 days

#34
post #11
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Safari?[0] It's especially a problem when Apple don't allow other browser engines on its devices, although governments are looking into that.[1] [0] https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/22/safari_risks_becoming... [1] https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/06/10/uk-antitrust-agen...

I dunno, then there would only be 2 actively maintained browser engines, Chrome and Firefox. Webkit is doing pretty good on https://wpt.fyi/interop-2022 so I'm not sure why Safari should be retired.

The problem is a mountain of older ipads and iphones and ipods that aren't eligible for the latest major ios upgrades, and thus get stuck with an outdated safari/wkwebview/webkit implementation. This is only going to get worse as the EOL'd ipads these days are quite powerful and usable otherwise. And due to Apple policies banning bring-your-own-html-engine, firefox or chrome can't save them either :(

Re: Official IE11 end-of-life in 2 days

#35
post #27
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But they would also have Edge installed in Windows Server 2022. It's a very small population that has a trivial workaround: use the _default_ default browser that came with the server operating system.

Except that new browser won’t support Active-X or Java applets. Yes those still exist. Yes they are needed. Yes I have to support them. Pity me.

> Except that new browser won’t support Active-X or Java applets.

That's mostly just used for specialized websites/webapps I think (often internal)? You can still launch IE for that, and use Edge, Chrome, Firefox, or any other browser for regular browsing. It's not substantially different from using Electron for desktop apps when you think about it.

Many years ago I worked for a company that used an internal ActiveX-based application (which worked fairly well for us) and this is pretty much what everyone was doing.

The biggest hurdle is probably corporate policies and such that prevent installing any alternative to IE yourself and IT dept. doesn't want to provide you with one either, but at this point I think that's just $BigCorp's problem and I don't care any more. For the record: I take web compat fairly serious and made things compatible with IE11 up to last year, but there's a limit.

Re: Official IE11 end-of-life in 2 days

#36
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Safari?[0] It's especially a problem when Apple don't allow other browser engines on its devices, although governments are looking into that.[1] [0] https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/22/safari_risks_becoming... [1] https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/06/10/uk-antitrust-agen...

My only wish is that Apple make it easy to run Safari, both latest version and older version, on non-Apple device. I have had a design that broke only on Safari, and I would be at my wit end on how to fix it if I didn't have a Mac on hand. Even Microsoft still provide VM with IE8 [0] for testing purpose. 0: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/tools/v...

> I have had a design that broke only on Safari, and I would be at my wit end on how to fix it if I didn't have a Mac on hand.

I use BrowserStack for it; for just one issue a trail account is enough, if you use it for an open source project you can request free access, and for a business it's relatively cheap.

I've got a pro account for a few of my open source projects; I don't often use it, but have on occasion (for things like you describe, and I don't have a Mac on hand).

Re: Official IE11 end-of-life in 2 days

#37
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except that new browser won’t support Active-X or Java applets. Yes those still exist. Yes they are needed. Yes I have to support them. Pity me.

> Except that new browser won’t support Active-X or Java applets. That's mostly just used for specialized websites/webapps I think (often internal)? You can still launch IE for that, and use Edge, Chrome, Firefox, or any other browser for regular browsing. It's not substantially different from using Electron for desktop apps when you think about it. Many years ago I worked for a company that used an internal ActiveX-…

Oh it’s definitely specialized stuff using Java. Like one feature of the specialized B2B thing I work on.

The process to replace that feature is not done. So here I am.

Re: Official IE11 end-of-life in 2 days

#38
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Safari?[0] It's especially a problem when Apple don't allow other browser engines on its devices, although governments are looking into that.[1] [0] https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/22/safari_risks_becoming... [1] https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/06/10/uk-antitrust-agen...

My only wish is that Apple make it easy to run Safari, both latest version and older version, on non-Apple device. I have had a design that broke only on Safari, and I would be at my wit end on how to fix it if I didn't have a Mac on hand. Even Microsoft still provide VM with IE8 [0] for testing purpose. 0: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/tools/v...

I have a macbook on my desk. The only reason it's here is to run Safari a couple of times a year when something crazy happens.

Some time in the last couple of years, it needed an OS update that took a couple of resident Apple experts to get through.

Re: Official IE11 end-of-life in 2 days

#40
post #6
post #3

Great news! What is the next big piece of software that needs to be retired to make the Internet a better place?

Safari?[0] It's especially a problem when Apple don't allow other browser engines on its devices, although governments are looking into that.[1] [0] https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/22/safari_risks_becoming... [1] https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/06/10/uk-antitrust-agen...

Moving to a monobrowser internet... What could go wrong?

Edit: oh, I should add:

The main data from your first source is out-of-date... Here's the dashboard today: https://wpt.fyi/compat2021?feature=summary&stable

Your second source is more of an argument to keep Safari around. If the Chrome/Safari duopoly on mobile is a problem, getting rid of Safari makes it worse.

Post reply on HN