Live data from Hacker News

FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

ftc.gov

61–70 of 299 posts

Re: FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

#61
Vet clinics became very popular private equity targets recently.

One of the people I know in PE described their profit margins as being surprisingly high even before PE roll-ups. They said that some PE firms were on a mission to acquire all of the vet firms in metro areas and then drive prices up even further because the demand is so inelastic. There was a secondary rush where people were trying to acquire vet clinics in anticipation of flipping them to PE roll-ups later.

My local vet seems to have gone down this slide. A long time ago it felt like a staff that really just cared about animals and had good prices. On my last visit it felt like I was bombarded with practiced pitches for different products and services at every step of the process. They even added some expensive vitamin product to my bill despite me declining it during the service. They removed it when I caught it on the bill before walking out the door, but only after a last attempt at pitching me on it. I could tell they were heavily incentivized to sell as much as possible. I didn't go back, but at this point I don't know where else to go.

Re: FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My partner works in this industry and in fact has friends that are affected by this merger. While the FTC can and does have the ability to do many things simultaneously, the current situation in the vet industry is dire . Corporate vets are more profitable (through price-gouging), have a virtual stranglehold on increasingly limited labor pools, and are pretty much the only ones that can afford to invest in specialty…

Could you explain this more? If the corp vets are price gouging, why are consumers choosing them over the smaller vets?

Locality / scarcity. There are just not that-that many vets around. Also specialized services, 'gotcha' billing etc..

Re: FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

#63
It's clear that no one in the comments section has actually read the article.

There are specifically 6 clinics that JAB has to sell to a third-party after the acquisition - all of them are either emergency or specialists of which the market is uniquely bare of options.

The FTC has no problem with clinics rolling up into a chain.

Re: FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My partner works in this industry and in fact has friends that are affected by this merger. While the FTC can and does have the ability to do many things simultaneously, the current situation in the vet industry is dire . Corporate vets are more profitable (through price-gouging), have a virtual stranglehold on increasingly limited labor pools, and are pretty much the only ones that can afford to invest in specialty…

Could you explain this more? If the corp vets are price gouging, why are consumers choosing them over the smaller vets?

Because one typically only uses the Vet closest to the pet. If your only options are the guy(s) down the street(s) in any direction are "which vet is closest to me" and they ALL happen to be the same corporate entity who can grid the community with vets... you'll get gouged.

What will be interesting is when they go buying up all the farm vets -- and then hiking THOSE prices up, which will put further costs on farms and animals, food and crops... and then that translates into an ADDITIONAL increase in costs of food/collapse of independent farmers and further control of the price-supply-line of all foods...

They alread did this in conjunct with pharma and agri-fertilizer bullshit...

I wouldnt be surprised if Monsanto is behind this...

Do these funds mandate the vendors from whom the vets can buy medicines and supplies from, likely the other companies they own.

This is "Serious Business" -- and these people are EVIL.

They dont give a fuck about anything, but have paid a bunch of quants to maths death into profits.

Re: FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

if only there was some kind of other option used by all developed countries except the US... too bad there isn't, i guess i'll just die when i cant afford healthcare

What is the other option? Either insurance by private or government bodies or cash is all I've ever seen. Government and private insurance raises prices. Cash excludes poor people.

[deleted]

Re: FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

#66
post #22

The term "end stage capitalism" (or the more palatable "late capitalism") I've heard a lot recently and things like this really make me wonder. The voracious and insatiable appetite for profit has led to some really disgusting practices for example: - Goldman Sachs driving up food prices, which quite literally kills people, for profit [1] - Hedge funds buying up trailer parks and jacking up the rates [2] - Medical pr…

Regulatory captures is a specific thing, it's not so much applicable to 'housing' because contractors don't have some hill to climb vis-a-vis regulations that big contractors have some kind of advantage.

Drugs, where we definitely want regulation, have that kind of issue, there are huge regulatory hurdles to jump through that require scale.

Re: FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

#67

Vet clinics became very popular private equity targets recently. One of the people I know in PE described their profit margins as being surprisingly high even before PE roll-ups. They said that some PE firms were on a mission to acquire all of the vet firms in metro areas and then drive prices up even further because the demand is so inelastic. There was a secondary rush where people were trying to acquire vet clinic…

I worked with people who did (human) clinic roll ups.

Part of the issue at hand is that doctors and physicians are notoriously bad businesspeople. So once they build up a big enough practice, a lot of them will jump on the chance to sell the side of the business that they hate to a management firm.

Re: FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

#68

I don't understand how some ( to me ) obvious anticompetitive corps seem to go unnoticed, but in this case veterinary clinics are receiving scrutiny.

Probably because many of the things you consider monopolies aren't actually monopolies.

Google is one such example on this board that is often accused of being a monopoly but in real terms is not.

Re: FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My partner works in this industry and in fact has friends that are affected by this merger. While the FTC can and does have the ability to do many things simultaneously, the current situation in the vet industry is dire . Corporate vets are more profitable (through price-gouging), have a virtual stranglehold on increasingly limited labor pools, and are pretty much the only ones that can afford to invest in specialty…

Emergency vets in many places will demand you pay $5,000 upfront (within minutes before surgery is performed) or your pet dies. Then, your pet will die anyway. It is a sad and exploitative industry.

> It is a sad and exploitative industry.

just wait till you see what they do with human healthcare in this country

Re: FTC acts against private equity firm’s acquisition of veterinary clinics

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

BlackStone Vangauard Etc. There have been COUNTLESS videos about the above and how much they own. These are the monopolies we should be going after.

Index funds almost never vote with their shares. To say that vanguard having equity ownership without utilizing their voting rights leads to market failures seems incredibly naive.

Sure, until you actually look at the matrices of controlling board / ceo / congress seats these guys hold, and what has been recorded throughout history in what they do when investing...

Its incredibly naive to think that they arent actively affecting prices.

"What are you talking about, these guys are JOB CREATORS! they only invest in index holds!"

Yeah... good luck deciphering whats really happening when you think such.

---

I don't give a shit what you think about John Oliver, but his "Corp Consolidation" piece shows you just how these units operate:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00wQYmvfhn4

By funding of the smaller guys to be bought out by their bigger players... they then control the play of that industry...

Then they ensure that they all buy in-network shit... so all profits stay in the family. Incestuventure Capitalism. (And no its not about "economies at scale on pricing"

"Economies at SCALING of Price Fixing" Food. Oil. Housing. Transport. Healthcare. Education. Policing/Politics ("Safety").

OWNING THE MASLOWS HIERARCHY OF NEEDS. That's their business model.

Post reply on HN