Live data from Hacker News

Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

twitter.com

51–60 of 532 posts

Re: Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

#51
> This is due to an earlier batch of transactions getting stuck from low transaction fees submitted and hence, resulting in a backlog of Bitcoin (BTC) network withdrawals. The Binance team is working on a solution to resume Bitcoin (BTC) network withdrawals soon.

https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/8437dfd1c7bf...

Re: Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

#52

"stuck transaction causing a backlog" Can someone explain the mechanism here? What is going on? (Is it something interally at Binance or something to do with the Bitcoin network.)

Doubt it's that. They ran out of reserve for their fractional reserve. Crypto on exchange wallets has already been dwindling the past few months.

Re: Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

#53

"stuck transaction causing a backlog" Can someone explain the mechanism here? What is going on? (Is it something interally at Binance or something to do with the Bitcoin network.)

You know how the internet is a series of tubes? Well someone clogged the bitcoin tube over at Binance.

Re: Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

#54
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does this mean? Stripe Crypto is a scam because they happen to be using cryptocurrencies? Maybe Stripe should stop their crypto endeavors because they have a crypto offering which means it's a scam.

I have no idea how you made this mental leap. I don't understand the question.

Not a mental leap.

If you are saying 'ALL crypto is a scam' this also includes all and any crypto offerings by any company. Stripe, Coinbase, FTX, Binance, Moneygram etc are included. Not to mention the 'DeFi' space as well.

Re: Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

#55
post #20

You really cannot make this up. As usual crypto in practice is the opposite of decentralized because people. Will. Not. Run. Their. Servers. Moxie nailed it

It is known for years that centralised exchanges can do this with custodial wallets. Not exactly the discovery of the century. Cryptocurrencies can be held in offline wallets i.e non-custodial hardware or software wallets, like Metamask, Trust Wallet, Ledger Nano, Tezos etc. But no, let's rush into the comments section and scream our heads off and create panic that it is 'exchanges === all crypto is scam'. When it is…

The only reason the price went into the stratosphere was the millions of speculators using custodial wallets. So it seems that many (likely most?) users didn't actually care about the "feature" of being able to self-host - what they actually wanted was a higher yielding bank account. Hence the reason so many people don't really believe it has much of a future as a fiat replacement.

Re: Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You should be asking "what exactly is the point of holding BTC on Binance"

We should be asking "what exactly is the point of holding BTC"

Holding BTC for the long term has historically been a lucrative investment. Just not holding it on one of the many centralized exchanges that always seem to get hacked or go bust.

Re: Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

#57
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have no idea how you made this mental leap. I don't understand the question.

Not a mental leap. If you are saying 'ALL crypto is a scam' this also includes all and any crypto offerings by any company. Stripe, Coinbase, FTX, Binance, Moneygram etc are included. Not to mention the 'DeFi' space as well.

Those companies aren't immune from getting suckered in to a scam.

Re: Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

#58

"stuck transaction causing a backlog" Can someone explain the mechanism here? What is going on? (Is it something interally at Binance or something to do with the Bitcoin network.)

Two guesses:

Guess one, they made a big transaction with most of their hot wallet, partially paying out to someone who withdrew, with the rest going back to the hot wallet. This transaction is in the queue but not finalized yet. The network won't accept any other spends of that money. Because that would be a double spend. So until that transaction is finalized (or it gets to old) that bitcoin is 'stuck'.

Or alternatively their hot wallet is empty and they have an outstanding transaction to refill it from their cold wallet. (They have the cash, but they have to wait until they can get it from their 'vault', and there is a traffic jam on the way to the vault).

I am not sure the first guess actually still works this way, I vaguely recall there are now mechanisms for one transaction to 'override' another non-confirmed transaction.

Re: Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We should be asking "what exactly is the point of holding BTC"

Holding BTC for the long term has historically been a lucrative investment. Just not holding it on one of the many centralized exchanges that always seem to get hacked or go bust.

Prices went up exactly because of these centralized exchanges.

Re: Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance

#60
post #20

You really cannot make this up. As usual crypto in practice is the opposite of decentralized because people. Will. Not. Run. Their. Servers. Moxie nailed it

meanwhile anybody who has their own keys is able to transact with it as per usual. “not your keys not your coin.” holding keys are not trivial but far simpler than running a server, better analogy might be to do with people not wanting to stake with a validator because it’s easier to use a centralized staking service.

I wonder if that's even a majority of bitcoin owners. I use the term owners loosely.
Post reply on HN