Live data from Hacker News

15.ai

15.ai

111–120 of 192 posts

Re: 15.ai

#111

The disclaimer is a little ironic considering the site owner doesn’t own the model (MIT does) and doesn’t own the training data (the various shows and games do)

MIT doesn’t own the model, where did you get that idea from? If you read through the website, it says that the developer alone owns everything related to the project, and the only funding he received from MIT was a small amount from the beginning.

It’s really strange reading these ignorant comments from HN…

Re: 15.ai

#112
post #62

> All code and models used for this website were written and trained as part of my research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The code and models are privately owned and are not to be sold or distributed for unauthorized use. Does anybody else find the irony in this statement absolutely amazing lol.

The author took someone else's IP as training data, trained a model on someone else's compute, and then gets extremely bent out of shape when others use the model without crediting them?

This entire thread is honestly so disturbing, this comment especially. Not only is it rife with misinformation (using copyrighted material for training is totally legal and the whole project is paid out of pocket), but is it really that big of a deal to want credit for the work they’ve done? The developer has had their work stolen by companies, influencers, and grifters, and people here are getting pissy that they can’t wait 10 seconds to wait for a popup.

I don’t know why, but I honestly expected more from HN.

Re: 15.ai

#113
post #62

> All code and models used for this website were written and trained as part of my research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The code and models are privately owned and are not to be sold or distributed for unauthorized use. Does anybody else find the irony in this statement absolutely amazing lol.

So is this a blanket approval for anyone with AI synthesis of voices, to sample hours of any _copyrighted content_ and come up with a TTS that is copyrighted to the new owner?

In other words, if I deep fake someone's photo on someone else's body, I own the rights of that 'model'?

Re: 15.ai

#114
post #50
post #33

Oh god, 50 shades of SpongePants. The future is wild in ways I never imagined. Star Trek style holodecks in what, 15 years? So, creepy thought: should we be recording audio of our parents, so we can still "hear from them" once in a while after they die? People are going to want to reconstruct their lost loved ones with AI. This project seems to imply you only need an hour or so of audio.

After my dad died, we found that he had recorded every phone call he had with us. I thought about doing this combined with text generation to create plausible prompts but never got the guts to go through with it. He wouldn't care if I had done it, but it wouldn't ease the guilt from years of sighs and rolling my eyes when he called at always the wrong times.

There is a great story of this - the creation of a "DadBot"

https://www.wired.com/story/a-sons-race-to-give-his-dying-fa...

Re: 15.ai

#115
Hello. I made this. I'm a bit shocked at how many people are getting things wrong and taking things out of context, so perhaps I could answer some questions.

To clarify: I have not been with MIT in years. I was paid the minimum hourly rate (roughly $14 an hour) to work on a related project during my undergraduate years, which eventually evolved into this project years down the road. (In fact, I had to pay for my own compute to get my work started - MIT never offered me any credits.) Everything else has been paid out of pocket since then. Yes, it does indeed cost several thousands of dollars a month - that is not an exaggeration. This has been optimized so many times that the technology needs to improve first before I can cut down on costs.

The timer in the "TOS" was put there in hopes that people could understand where I was coming from in regards to misappropriating this kind of research. I did not expect people to get this riled up over a 10 second timer. (Especially not on Hacker News, of all places...)

Edit: I suppose it makes sense to include other information in this post so that others don't have to go hunting for my comments in this thread:

- >This is unrelated but what's with the fascination with HN users and My Little Pony? I've noticed this on a lot of posts in the past few months.

- Twilight Sparkle's voice is indispensable in getting emotional contextualizers to work properly. The logo and profile picture is an homage to that fact.

- >But seriously: how did you get the domain `15.ai`?

- I purchased it. It was definitely not cheap.

- >They named their tts "Deep Throat"? Why would you?

- It was a suggestion from a Twitter user, and I found it clever.

- >I heavily doubt it's "several thousands of dollars"...

- It is indeed several thousands of dollars a month. I can show you AWS invoices, if you're skeptical. Just send me an email and I'd be happy to show proof.

- >The disclaimer is a little ironic considering the site owner doesn’t own the model (MIT does) and doesn’t own the training data (the various shows and games do)

- I'm sorry to tell you that I do, in fact, own my own model. I have not been with MIT in years.

Re: 15.ai

#116
post #115

Hello. I made this. I'm a bit shocked at how many people are getting things wrong and taking things out of context, so perhaps I could answer some questions. To clarify: I have not been with MIT in years. I was paid the minimum hourly rate (roughly $14 an hour) to work on a related project during my undergraduate years, which eventually evolved into this project years down the road. (In fact, I had to pay for my own…

Do you still ban users from using different AI voices together?

Re: 15.ai

#117
post #115

Hello. I made this. I'm a bit shocked at how many people are getting things wrong and taking things out of context, so perhaps I could answer some questions. To clarify: I have not been with MIT in years. I was paid the minimum hourly rate (roughly $14 an hour) to work on a related project during my undergraduate years, which eventually evolved into this project years down the road. (In fact, I had to pay for my own…

Do you still ban users from using different AI voices together?

I have no control over that. Exactly how do you expect me to enforce this?

Re: 15.ai

#118
post #62

> All code and models used for this website were written and trained as part of my research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The code and models are privately owned and are not to be sold or distributed for unauthorized use. Does anybody else find the irony in this statement absolutely amazing lol.

[deleted]

Re: 15.ai

#119

I appreciate the intent, and I understand that many people will do the wrong thing so this was probably an attempt to get such folks to actually read and adhere to the TOS, but the obnoxious consent dialog with a mandatory countdown turned me off. It’s probably not effective, either. On desktop, maybe I’d open dev tools and remove it. On mobile, I won’t be bothered. I hate that this is what the web has become and I c…

[deleted]

Re: 15.ai

#120
post #115

Hello. I made this. I'm a bit shocked at how many people are getting things wrong and taking things out of context, so perhaps I could answer some questions. To clarify: I have not been with MIT in years. I was paid the minimum hourly rate (roughly $14 an hour) to work on a related project during my undergraduate years, which eventually evolved into this project years down the road. (In fact, I had to pay for my own…

Do you still plan to publish your research in a paper?
Post reply on HN