Live data from Hacker News

The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

teachforamerica.org

21–30 of 922 posts

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#21

"The current population of students we identify as academically gifted and talented is unacceptably whiter and wealthier than the actual student population of academically gifted and talented students should be." A typical IQ threshold for a gifted program is 130. The average IQ overall is 100 with standard deviation 15. For black Americans the average score on IQ tests is about 85, which explains why blacks will be…

Did you read the part where he pointed out that black/brown students are 66% less likely to be in a gifted program with the same test scores ?

Is that because the program discriminates or because their family lacks awareness of such programs?

Those have very different solutions.

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#22
Still bending over backwards to accommodate a racial equity narrative. How about you don’t look at a child’s skin color before you decide how they are educated and instead focus on doing the best you can for each instead of trying to make everything about achieving social justice goals. Anything else is racism.

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#24
post #15

I’m not aware of studies showing that gifted programs have a positive impact on student performance. My hunch is that the typical school district is looking for a palatable excuse to reduce funding needs.

They were the only interesting classes. Project based learning. Being with other students that actually gave a shit.

Can confirm, I went through several and they were all massively formative experiences. I wouldn't trade them for anything.

If anything, children should be offered more opportunities to seek this kind of free form enrichment.

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#25
post #11

Gifted programs are "unacceptably white". WTF does that mean? I had to pass essentially an IQ test to get placed into those classes. For me, it made a big difference in being engaged in schoolwork when every class consisted of reiterating content for days which I had mastered in minutes. Edit: I removed "I don't see what race has to do with it." I do see how race can affect this when the gatekeeper is a teacher with…

Just read what he wrote? > Black students are 66% less likely to be identified as gifted compared to white students with similar test scores. Black, Latinx, and Native American students are far less likely to attend a school that even offers a gifted program.

How is that an answer? If someone isn't meeting the qualifications they aren't in. What's "unacceptable" about that?

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#26
post #11

Gifted programs are "unacceptably white". WTF does that mean? I had to pass essentially an IQ test to get placed into those classes. For me, it made a big difference in being engaged in schoolwork when every class consisted of reiterating content for days which I had mastered in minutes. Edit: I removed "I don't see what race has to do with it." I do see how race can affect this when the gatekeeper is a teacher with…

[deleted]

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#27
post #19

> I agree that it is unacceptable to have eighth grade Algebra I classes and gifted education programs that disproportionately exclude Black and brown children. But if equity is the goal, we should be mandating that every eighth grader takes Algebra I—and then structure the entire pre-K to seventh grade student experience to ensure this is a legitimate possibility for every child. Since when does equity mean everyone…

> Why can't we just admit it and quit trying to make people who are unique the same? America keeps conflating equity for equality.

The conflation is a very recent intellectual phenomena.

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#28
The kids of elites and the rich will always have opportunities regardless of aptitude. Is it any surprise actor's kids tend to also have many opportunities in acting. Opposing gifted education, acceleration, etc. seems like another way of pulling up the ladder, even if it's framed as being well-intentioned.

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#29
post #11

Gifted programs are "unacceptably white". WTF does that mean? I had to pass essentially an IQ test to get placed into those classes. For me, it made a big difference in being engaged in schoolwork when every class consisted of reiterating content for days which I had mastered in minutes. Edit: I removed "I don't see what race has to do with it." I do see how race can affect this when the gatekeeper is a teacher with…

Just read what he wrote? > Black students are 66% less likely to be identified as gifted compared to white students with similar test scores. Black, Latinx, and Native American students are far less likely to attend a school that even offers a gifted program.

Unacceptably white is still a horrible way to phrase this. Is the NBA unacceptably black? Why don't we remove basketball courts from inner cities and cut off black kid's feet /s eye roll

BTW, I realize he is arguing for the opposite of this.

edit: If you think I am racist or something let me spell it out as I did in another comment: It is not unacceptable when white children have opportunities. It is unacceptable when black children do not.

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#30
post #20

Eliminating accelerated or gifted programs doesn't create equality any more than mandating a uniform maximum height will stop people from growing past 2 meters in height. All it does it rob society at large from the possibility of the exceptionally able from realizing their potential sooner. If we're willing, as a body politic, to eschew the possibility of an exceptional learner from discovering things like the cure…

Equity != Equality. Equity is semantically closer to equality of outcome than equality (of conditions/opportunities).
Post reply on HN