Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not just flawed argument, but wildly inaccurate data that was then grossly misapplied. Unfortunately a lot of people on HN will just read the headline and think this is true, when it's very far from being the case. I wish we could link this whole thread to the refutation instead of further propagating this misinformation.
We don't know whether it is the case or not. It could just as easily be worse than it says. Probably is. If I had to tell you about all the medical mistakes experienced by just my immediate family, just the facts, I would be at it all day long.
Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S. (2016)
121–130 of 235 posts
Re: Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S. (2016)
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What qualifies as a medical error? If we just classified things that are obvious. Wrong medication applied (ie paper says to deliver 10mg of Advil but you got a vitamin C tablet), wrong leg amputated, wrong patient data looked at leading to a bad diagnosis. We would likely find a large number of incidents, however no way on earth will you get the American medical cartel to report on them honestly.
Calling doctors, collectively, the "American medical cartel" isn't helpful language. It's just more polarizing politics that breaks down constructive dialogue.
From limiting residency slots, making it nearly impossible to hire foreign doctors and lobbying for safe medications that are sold over the counter in the rest of the world to be sold as prescription only in the US. Just to name a few, the AMA has served it's members well to the detriment of anyone buying healthcare in the United States. That to me is a cartel, they just use a "certificate of need" to enforce it's will rather than a gun.
Re: Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S. (2016)
#123apparently based on very flawed arguments https://gidmk.medium.com/medical-error-is-not-the-third-lead...
Re: Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S. (2016)
#124Re: Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S. (2016)
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't think "age" is a valid cause of death. Uhm, considering our technological advancement in the medical sector I'd argue "age" should be the only valid cause of death. Sadly it isn't for obvious reasons (firearms, car crashes, everything else related to safety etc., hunger, lack of medical equipment and supplies etc. etc. etc.) ... and ironically the article is one of those causes that could and should be easi…
> Uhm, considering our technological advancement in the medical sector I'd argue "age" should be the only valid cause of death. For this to be true we would have to be able to predict and treat every possible disease and condition, wherever it occurred. When I had my Ventricular Fibrillation event I was lucky that it occurred just outside the door of a place that had a defibrillator. If it had occurred twenty minutes…
Assuming there was a cause of your fibrillation; maybe advancement in imaging and detection could have spotted worsening rhythm or small damage developing in the heart, or growing chemical imbalance in time before it happened, and given you an Implantable defibrillator[1] in advance, or a hypothetical wearable one, or treatment to repair the damage and avoid it happening.
I sometimes wonder what it would take in terms of FutureTech to "save everyone"; how about if you were alone but concsious, defibrillator tech builtin to every vehicle (electric vehicles at least have some high voltage power already; sensing and cables wouldn't be a big addition to them) would have got a treatment close enough to be useful. If you were unconscious and wearing a watch with ECG features, it could detect you falling over and alert somewhere, a defibrillator drone takes off, today's fast drones can do 50+mph it could have spikes to get through your clothing and be alerting a telemedicine doctor to remote view it...
I suppose we have to rule out teleportation, but humanoid robots are fairly credible, suffusing the planetary surface with nanotech is uncomfortably credible and that possibly changes a lot. e.g. blood additives which carry much more oxygen and can keep your brain alive after your heart stops pumping until help can arrive, or etc.
[1] https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/arrhythmia/prevention...
Re: Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S. (2016)
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
Calling doctors, collectively, the "American medical cartel" isn't helpful language. It's just more polarizing politics that breaks down constructive dialogue.
Don't behave like a cartel if you don't want to be called one. From limiting residency slots, making it nearly impossible to hire foreign doctors and lobbying for safe medications that are sold over the counter in the rest of the world to be sold as prescription only in the US. Just to name a few, the AMA has served it's members well to the detriment of anyone buying healthcare in the United States. That to me is a c…
Re: Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S. (2016)
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
I gather you are not a healthcare professional, hence the artificial dichotomy stemming from your perception as an outsider. Medical competency is very difficult to assess objectively. You're good/bad because people say so. There isn't any form of performance feedback.
How can that be? A patient gets diagnosed. There's treatment. There's an outcome. That can't be measured? And assessed? There's data flowing all over the place. But perhaps the lawyers and the insurance stand in the way of improvement?
Re: Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S. (2016)
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
He’s apparently so important and busy that he has to make these videos while driving in his super car from point A to point B. 15 years ago, this “content” would have been a blog post, which we could have skimmed in 30 seconds to get the gist of the counter argument. Now it’s a 10 minute video with no notes, buried behind 2 ads. Next time, give us a 2 sentence summarization of the argument you’re linking.
Can you spare the rest of us and give the aforementioned two sentence summarization?
- the figures come from studies with methodological issues (non-representative populations, overly-broad criteria for what's counted as a death from medical error)
Re: Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S. (2016)
#129Re: Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S. (2016)
#130“Incidence rates for deaths directly attributable to medical care gone awry haven’t been recognized in any standardized method for collecting national statistics,” That's because they're hard to standardize. What qualifies as a medical error? It's easy to go back after the fact and analyze a case where someone has a poor outcome and say 'we should have done this another way'. That doesn't mean there was any indicatio…