apparently based on very flawed arguments https://gidmk.medium.com/medical-error-is-not-the-third-lead...
Not just flawed argument, but wildly inaccurate data that was then grossly misapplied.
Unfortunately a lot of people on HN will just read the headline and think this is true, when it's very far from being the case. I wish we could link this whole thread to the refutation instead of further propagating this misinformation.
apparently based on very flawed arguments https://gidmk.medium.com/medical-error-is-not-the-third-lead...
Interesting, according to the medium article: 1) the numbers used in the study are wrong 2) they are not representative and 3) the numbers do not represent medical error
From the article:
The problem is that this is very subjective and mostly assessable in hindsight — it’s easy to say on reviewing a person’s chart that they might’ve done better on different medication, but whether that really does constitute a medical error is complex and not nearly as cut-and-dried as the BMJ paper suggests.
I don't think "age" is a valid cause of death. Old people are more likely to die than young people, but they still die from particular causes that should be distinguished and recorded. For people of any age it's not obvious how to record a combination of circumstances or a cascade of conditions. For example, a very common fate for old people is to fall, break a hip ("neck of femur"), be admitted into hospital, and th…
> I don't think "age" is a valid cause of death.
Uhm, considering our technological advancement in the medical sector I'd argue "age" should be the only valid cause of death. Sadly it isn't for obvious reasons (firearms, car crashes, everything else related to safety etc., hunger, lack of medical equipment and supplies etc. etc. etc.) ... and ironically the article is one of those causes that could and should be easily avoided.
Medical insurer's profits are limited to a percentage of their gross income, so, more expensive medications and procedures are preferred to less expensive ones in order to preserve overall income.
I don't understand. If you pay $5000 a year for your medical insurance, but it paid $10k for your medication, how have they made money? If they could purchase the same medication for $2000 instead, surely it would be more profitable for them?
Verticle Integration. For example, CVS Caremark is my insurance. They force me to get most medication through CVS or their mail order service.
This is insane. These device UIs should be standardized and any manufacturer making a significant UI change to their product should not be permitted to sell it under the same name and number. The FDA should be looking at this before approving such devices for use. Don't aircraft have more or less standardized controls and displays?
"Don't aircraft have more or less standardized controls and displays?" Commercial pilots (and military) are required to train and qualify on a particular aircraft before being allowed to fly it. Controls can differ, but it's generally the difference in flight characteristics/handling that is the difference. Although we can see that the different computer related controls and lack of training were a factor in the Max…
The main cause was completely insane specifications. With a reasonable design the plane would not have become uncontrollable under any possible sequence of events, training or no, familiarity or no.
apparently based on very flawed arguments https://gidmk.medium.com/medical-error-is-not-the-third-lead...
Interesting, according to the medium article: 1) the numbers used in the study are wrong 2) they are not representative and 3) the numbers do not represent medical error From the article: The problem is that this is very subjective and mostly assessable in hindsight — it’s easy to say on reviewing a person’s chart that they might’ve done better on different medication, but whether that really does constitute a medica…
Yeah, there are medical errors like "patient got the opposite treatment of what they should have been given" or "gross misdiagnosis" but there's also "didn't get the ideal drug for their case - but got something ok"
I don't think "age" is a valid cause of death. Old people are more likely to die than young people, but they still die from particular causes that should be distinguished and recorded. For people of any age it's not obvious how to record a combination of circumstances or a cascade of conditions. For example, a very common fate for old people is to fall, break a hip ("neck of femur"), be admitted into hospital, and th…
It’s almost as if the medical community should come up with a general term for a death caused by a combination of complications due to circumstances highly correlated with being old.
I don't think "age" is a valid cause of death. Old people are more likely to die than young people, but they still die from particular causes that should be distinguished and recorded. For people of any age it's not obvious how to record a combination of circumstances or a cascade of conditions. For example, a very common fate for old people is to fall, break a hip ("neck of femur"), be admitted into hospital, and th…
> I don't think "age" is a valid cause of death. > so the cause of death was ...? Age?
One of the main purposes of recording cause of death is so that we know what to concentrate on for improving public health. For example, perhaps we could make old people's bones less brittle by adding vitamins to bread, or do something to persuade more of them to eat something other than just bread and jam, or perhaps we could stop them getting infected with pneumonia in hospitals, or somehow make pneumonia more survivable, or ... Putting "age" as the "cause of death" would be about as useful as putting "birth" or "cessation of the vital functions".
And a sizeable portion of that medical error is due to poor device UX: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XJbwN6EZ4I
Probably why the MDR in the EU forces new products to conduct usability testing in their product design
A quick Google search will tell you whether the FDA in the US has similar requirements or instead perhaps medical devices in the US are the unregulated Wild West.