https://www.linkedin.com/in/maria-shippi-03321323a/
Thank you all for your feedback, thoughts, help and comments!
271–273 of 273 posts
https://www.linkedin.com/in/maria-shippi-03321323a/
Thank you all for your feedback, thoughts, help and comments!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What I mean is that being paid to be a parent is like being paid to watch a movie, or doing something you love. What's the point of paying you for it, if the act actually is its own reward?
I think my counter is that being a parent honestly seems thankless. It feels like you and I agree that maybe kids aren't for our lives and yet we're pretending its just a wildly rewarding activity like watching movies and not a situation of basically being worried or having to pay for or care for another human for the rest of your natural life. Even for two people who (I am assuming) do not have kids that feels kind…
I hear that the smile on your child's face is infinite reward.
> We know its not like watching a movie, or riding a bike or even going to the gym unless the gym costs you ~250k while simultaneously acting like the rude jerk I did when I was a teen.
Yet, like I said, people do it gladly. They do it even knowing about the way it affects the woman's body, knowing about the sleep depravation, knowing about the terrible two's, knowing about the "you're stupid and I hate you" teens.
If it were as simple as "this activity costs 250k and is a rude jerk" then nobody would do it. Yet they say it's so worth it.[1]
So if it's so worth it for you, then do it. But I don't want to hear about how you're the victim of your own choice. Everyone is. I'll never be a fighter pilot, nor an astronaut.[2]
Pilot and astronaut is the road not taken, for me.
If someone chooses to have a baby and stay home for 5 years, then that's about 11% of their working life not spent improving their career. You'll never have those 11% again, and I won't pretend you walked two roads at the same time. Because nobody can.
And those 11% are placed in a critical point. If someone took age 60-65 off, then that won't affect their career as much.
If someone leaves university at 25, has a baby and takes five years off, then they are now 30 with zero work experience.
That's not fairness, that's physics.
[1] Though one guy I know said he used to not be able to comprehend why anyone would not want children. Now after he's had children he understands. He would absolutely do it again, but at least he understands people who don't want them.
[2] not a real one, anyway. Maybe if prices go down a lot in my lifetime I'll be able to take a lap, but that's it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A paid year away from work is not minuscule. The benefits of somebody else having kids is minuscule to me. > If society does nothing to help then more parents will choose to have fewer, or no, children. Fewer people is our best option (it is still a terrible option, don't get me wrong) for mitigating the effects of climate change.
> The benefits of somebody else having kids is minuscule to me. Your parents having you is a miniscule benefit to you?