Alban Berg’s Dissonances
nybooks.com
Alban Berg’s Dissonances
1–10 of 15 posts
Re: Alban Berg’s Dissonances
#2Re: Alban Berg’s Dissonances
#3Wozzeck is also a pretty brutal opera if you listen while reading the lyrics.
Re: Alban Berg’s Dissonances
#4Re: Alban Berg’s Dissonances
#5When I see Alban Berg on the front page of HN, it really tells me I'm in the right place. I consider him, Webern, and Schoenberg as the "end" of western classical music. It's like the whole field ran into the brick wall of their work and never made it past.
But on the other hand, minimal music is a much more recent development, and it is certainly part of the "classical" tradition. There might be a bit of room left before we find the end.
Re: Alban Berg’s Dissonances
#6Re: Alban Berg’s Dissonances
#7When I see Alban Berg on the front page of HN, it really tells me I'm in the right place. I consider him, Webern, and Schoenberg as the "end" of western classical music. It's like the whole field ran into the brick wall of their work and never made it past.
There's this joke in the movie "Amadeus" where the emperor (Joseph II?) remarks that Mozart's music has "too many notes". He explains that the human ear can only hear so many notes. That might have a element of truth. Our perception is (obviously) limited, and beyond a certain point, complexity becomes overbearing. But on the other hand, minimal music is a much more recent development, and it is certainly part of the…
There's no end.
Re: Alban Berg’s Dissonances
#8When I see Alban Berg on the front page of HN, it really tells me I'm in the right place. I consider him, Webern, and Schoenberg as the "end" of western classical music. It's like the whole field ran into the brick wall of their work and never made it past.
Re: Alban Berg’s Dissonances
#9When I see Alban Berg on the front page of HN, it really tells me I'm in the right place. I consider him, Webern, and Schoenberg as the "end" of western classical music. It's like the whole field ran into the brick wall of their work and never made it past.
Stravinsky by contrast, and to a lesser extent the post war avant-garde such as Boulez and Stockhausen work in a completely different manner. To them the entire music history is "flattened", instead of a sequence of styles where the most recent is the most important, they plucked whatever they pleased from any period which pleased them. It's pretty difficult to follow any of these composers in that regard and now almost every composer has a personal eclectic style. It's a blessing and a curse, since I don't think any previous period had as much variety to encompass the likes of Ferneyhough and Reich and everything in between. On the other hand the loss of a "centre" is definitely a downside, at least when it comes to writing a history of the period :).
Re: Alban Berg’s Dissonances
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's this joke in the movie "Amadeus" where the emperor (Joseph II?) remarks that Mozart's music has "too many notes". He explains that the human ear can only hear so many notes. That might have a element of truth. Our perception is (obviously) limited, and beyond a certain point, complexity becomes overbearing. But on the other hand, minimal music is a much more recent development, and it is certainly part of the…
I sometimes think of the flood of notes in a bebop solo as being akin to the dots of color in a pointillist painting. As in, you can take them in as a continuous whole as well as discrete points. There's no end.