- A long README.md with lots of awards/stats images.
- Lots of repositories with single commits, no real explanations in the READMEs. Sometimes these are non-fork copies of more popular projects, which seems even more suspicious.
- Most of the repos have five to ten stars each, but if you open them up they are basically the same people over and over starring all the repos.
I don't want to share links to example profiles because these may be real people, and maybe there's some legitimate scenario where profiles look like this that I'm just not thinking of? It seems though like it's just pumping fake data to drive the stats in the readme.
The resumes that come along with the profiles seem normal enough, so I wanted to ask here if it's something that others are seeing as well? And if it's a red flag, as I assume at this point? I'm asking because I don't want to write people off if there's something benign happening here that I am just not familiar with.