Quoted post unavailable.
Quoted post unavailable.
Brave’s use of direct mailers
71–80 of 172 posts
Re: Brave’s use of direct mailers
#72Re: Brave’s use of direct mailers
#73Re: Brave’s use of direct mailers
#74Re: Brave’s use of direct mailers
#75[1] https://www.newsweek.com/postal-service-photographs-every-pi...
Re: Brave’s use of direct mailers
#76Re: Brave’s use of direct mailers
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
As far as I know, the database is owned by the USPS, and they can't do their job _without_ that information. You can dislike Brave for buying access to the information, or dislike USPS for selling said information. But the information is already collected by USPS so they can do their job.
Even if the database contains banding by household income for example? Why does the USPS need that to do their job? Brave doesn’t show what targeting was used…
If you have a problem with the US Census Bureau collecting demographic data or making it public, those are certainly valid positions to hold. However, point your ire at the right target.
Re: Brave’s use of direct mailers
#78Since the outside of all US mail is imaged and stored by the USPS and shared with other government agencies, [1] Brave just gave its user list to the US Government. [1] https://www.newsweek.com/postal-service-photographs-every-pi...
Re: Brave’s use of direct mailers
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Junk mail has a massive ecological footprint.
Junk mail is sequestered carbon that's been removed from the atmosphere.
Re: Brave’s use of direct mailers
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
He didn't donate to the wrong religion he donated to Prop 8 a proposal in California to ban same-sex marriage. Acting like same-sex marriage is a religion is bigoted and should not be tolerated here.