Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can't wait for this all to eventually leak. Countries need to realize data is not "free" and has a cost to it.
Is it not is already publicly known? Don’t think there’s anything to leak
Norway to track all supermarket purchases?
291–300 of 498 posts
Re: Norway to track all supermarket purchases?
#292Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's essential.
Seconded. I'm on an all-meat diet and I turned my health around thanks to it. Most often people who advocate eliminating meat look sickly, because they are.
Re: Norway to track all supermarket purchases?
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep; societally, they've got a very different attitude towards privacy. Everyone's salary is publicly available online. (So's the fact that you looked!) https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-40669239
As said in the article, we already share our data with the supermarket, google, etc and whatever other systems that binds all of them together. In that situation, I'm happy that government has access to the same data because it gives it a way to balance the private sector power. Now what is needed is the ability to opt out.
Re: Norway to track all supermarket purchases?
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're already being tracked by the grocery stores, wouldn't it be better to be tracked by someone who at least tries to have your best interests at heart vs. the grocery industry who just wants to sell you more?
At least you (hopefully) know what the Supermarket is up to - as you say, they just want to sell you more stuff. The government on the other hand - who knows what plans they might cook up.
At least with the government, you have a ton of elected representative who can help you if the government does something dumb with the data.
Re: Norway to track all supermarket purchases?
#295Earlier quoted context omitted.
But you agreed to be managed by the government right? Remember when they came round and you signed the contract? To pay 40%+ in taxes? For the ability to vote once every 4-5 years for someone to represent you? You don't? Nor me. Governments presume to have authority over everything in their domain. The belief in the false idea of 'government' by the majority is what sustains their power. It is actually immoral and fr…
You're free to live in the woods if you don't like the deal. You don't get to use any of society's infrastructure if you don't opt in, though. You won't be taxed, of course, since you can't engage with any economic activity within society. I'm sure you could make a nice commune in the wilderness somewhere. Just don't bring anything from society with you, like tools, clothes, food, livestock, seeds. Good luck out ther…
In the past, it was really hard to sever ties with one society and government and go form a new one, but you could actually find places where nobody would immediately chase you away (even then most expansion was at the expense of natives, though). Nowadays that's impossible. A small number of people could maybe live in Siberia undetected, but that's more like partisan warfare than establishing a new country: The moment Russian government finds out anyone's there, they're getting deported. Your best bet for not living in an existing state is amassing an army (likely illegal in your home country) and invading a weak state. Good luck.
Re: Norway to track all supermarket purchases?
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
Once we exsuahst all options to reduce climate change with limited impact on the customer, things like renewable energy(people don't care where their energy comes from), replacing unnecessary plastics with paper, etc, we can then talk about things like limiting meat consumption. But affecting peoples lifes without actually tackling industries and corporation that do way more harm is just stupid and basically serves O…
>>Those "business contributions to climate change" exist because they're producing goods that consumers want; you can't significantly reduce that without also affecting consumer lifestyles, by reducing the options for the number of goods, or making them more expensive. >without actually tackling industries and corporation that do way more harm is just stupid I think you're missing the parent poster's point, which is…
Re: Norway to track all supermarket purchases?
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Please consult the official list for alternatives.” More likely a new way to tax stuff that the government does not like. Eating too much red-meat from methane-producing cows? Extra climate change tax for you!
They should probably think about the Natural Gas that makes up 60 % of the total value of Norway's exports before they go virtue signalling to people eating meat from farms that use tractors.
Re: Norway to track all supermarket purchases?
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Quoted post unavailable.
> 'Democracy' is really 'representative democracy' - you vote for someone to represent you for 4-5 years.
You’re comfortable with this overly broad definition of slavery, but have issues with calling a form of democracy “democracy”?
Re: Norway to track all supermarket purchases?
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
At least you (hopefully) know what the Supermarket is up to - as you say, they just want to sell you more stuff. The government on the other hand - who knows what plans they might cook up.
That's incredibly facile. The supermarket can, and will, sell all your data because there's profit in it. Now try to make sense of how you know what they're up to. At least with the government, you have a ton of elected representative who can help you if the government does something dumb with the data.
Re: Norway to track all supermarket purchases?
#300Earlier quoted context omitted.
As said in the article, we already share our data with the supermarket, google, etc and whatever other systems that binds all of them together. In that situation, I'm happy that government has access to the same data because it gives it a way to balance the private sector power. Now what is needed is the ability to opt out.
Wow people really forgot that privacy is all about privacy with respect to the government because they are the ones with the monopoly on violence. It is tragic that people think private firms could ever be as evil as governments
Corporations are no stranger to violence. They're no stranger to organized crime dealings and tight relationships with governments. Coca-Cola for example has straight up assassinated union leaders.