I really don't like services that are invite only. Just let me sign up and give you my money. It took them about a year to send me an invitation. Of course I lost interest in the meantime.
Gmail was invite only at one point. I remember when everyone was clamoring for an invite. I wonder if it would’ve had the same success without that hype.
Email startup Superhuman lays off 22% of staff
21–30 of 108 posts
Re: Email startup Superhuman lays off 22% of staff
#22Re: Email startup Superhuman lays off 22% of staff
#23I really don't like services that are invite only. Just let me sign up and give you my money. It took them about a year to send me an invitation. Of course I lost interest in the meantime.
Gmail was invite only at one point. I remember when everyone was clamoring for an invite. I wonder if it would’ve had the same success without that hype.
Re: Email startup Superhuman lays off 22% of staff
#24I remember when this startup came out, all the VCs, angel investors and tech founders were singing songs of praises (and raises) about how this was going to disrupt email and gating the product an 'exclusive' access to a waitlist. I find it sus when VCs have to keep overhyping their portfolio companies, especially when they don't even make money. Anyway, I checked it out and found that this really isn't novel at all…
So many startups these days seem to only have other startups as their customers, and they're almost always due to connections between their investors. Just trading VC money back and forth.
Re: Email startup Superhuman lays off 22% of staff
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gmail was invite only at one point. I remember when everyone was clamoring for an invite. I wonder if it would’ve had the same success without that hype.
People were clamoring for an invite because it was profoundly better than anything else at the time. I browsed the Superhuman site and I can’t personally find anything compelling.
Re: Email startup Superhuman lays off 22% of staff
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gmail was invite only at one point. I remember when everyone was clamoring for an invite. I wonder if it would’ve had the same success without that hype.
People were clamoring for an invite because it was profoundly better than anything else at the time. I browsed the Superhuman site and I can’t personally find anything compelling.
Re: Email startup Superhuman lays off 22% of staff
#27Rahul has frequently personally responded to my inquiries about the product as well as recommendations.
They definitely don't deserve all of the hype or that high of a valuation, but I still think they are a great product.
Re: Email startup Superhuman lays off 22% of staff
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gmail was invite only at one point. I remember when everyone was clamoring for an invite. I wonder if it would’ve had the same success without that hype.
Invites weren't what got me hyped about Gmail. My Yahoo and Hotmail accounts had 2-5 MB storage limits at the time. Gmail offered a 1 GB storage limit. The idea that I'd never have to delete an email again is what had me hitting up old friends on AIM for an invite.
Re: Email startup Superhuman lays off 22% of staff
#29It’s cheaper and pretty much the same features without the bugs of Superhuman.