Live data from Hacker News

California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

macobserver.com

51–60 of 135 posts

Re: California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

#51
post #49
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Steve Jobs driving a car for 6 months actually might increase it's value. I may be exaggerating slightly but I bet it didn't cost all that much.

I don't think most people who can afford $120k Mercedes vehicles really care who's driven them before. If it was a Ferrari driven by a rock star, maybe , but people who drive Benzes are generally boring and reasonable.

That's a $120,000 car? Hopefully it looks better from the front, or is extremely comfortable.

Re: California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

#52
post #6

Approaching 4 years of driving with no plates on the same car here in California. Just leave the paper dealer plate(the one with the dealership name/logo on it) on the car. Cops wont ever pull you over for lack of plates, even if youre missing the front plate as well, as I am.

So you've avoided paying taxes on your new vehicle for 4 years. Thanks a lot, Mr. Freeloader.

Re: California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

#53
post #51
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think most people who can afford $120k Mercedes vehicles really care who's driven them before. If it was a Ferrari driven by a rock star, maybe , but people who drive Benzes are generally boring and reasonable.

That's a $120,000 car? Hopefully it looks better from the front, or is extremely comfortable.

It sounds (literally) pretty cool ;p Goes fast. Comfort is a secondary thing. In fact you gotta pay extra usually for the slim down race models with even less comfort. Forget the AC/radio... in some of those high end race car models.

Re: California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

#54
I don't really consider this a DMV loophole. It's just constantly driving a new car. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to "uncover" this loophole, it just takes a wealthy individual to be able to afford the the lease premium to do this if they are motivated enough.

Re: California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

#55

Can anyone explain the advantage to driving without plates? It seems that being the Mercedes AMG would be just as easy to identify as the Mercedes with the APPLE1 plate.

Are we sure we don't have this backwards?

Perhaps it's not that he got a new car every six months because he really disliked plates. Perhaps he just got a new car every six months because he really liked having a brand new car.

Heck, I would. I wouldn't always get the same car, like Steve Jobs, but then again I wouldn't always wear the same clothes either.

Re: California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

#56
post #51
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think most people who can afford $120k Mercedes vehicles really care who's driven them before. If it was a Ferrari driven by a rock star, maybe , but people who drive Benzes are generally boring and reasonable.

That's a $120,000 car? Hopefully it looks better from the front, or is extremely comfortable.

More like $140K. Actually I think they don't make the SL55 any more, so the latest one would have to be an SL63.

It doesn't look all that different to a $45,000 SLK, though, which makes it the insanely fast borderline-supercar of choice for the billionaire who wants to remain relatively inconspicuous.

Re: California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

#57
post #3

So basically, Steve got a new Mercedes more often than I get new shoes. Now that's what I expect out of a multibillionaire. Good to see he at least kept himself in new-car smell on a regular basis, and certainly kept a local dealer quite happy.

I'm not sure that he had to get a brand new car every six months. He could have created a new lease on the same car every six month from a leasing company. That should have been enough to satisfy the law: http://dmv.ca.gov/fee_calc/feecalcfaq.htm#plates

Re: California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

#58
post #49
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Steve Jobs driving a car for 6 months actually might increase it's value. I may be exaggerating slightly but I bet it didn't cost all that much.

I don't think most people who can afford $120k Mercedes vehicles really care who's driven them before. If it was a Ferrari driven by a rock star, maybe , but people who drive Benzes are generally boring and reasonable.

There is no such thing as a $120k used Mercedes, outside of a 65 or a Maybach. As for the boring and reasonable bit, search 'G550'.

Re: California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

#59
post #29

Can anyone explain the advantage to driving without plates? It seems that being the Mercedes AMG would be just as easy to identify as the Mercedes with the APPLE1 plate.

My best bet is he just didn't want to have to deal with the DMV...

If anyone happens to see this, the best thing I've learned this year is that you can do all your DMV business (at least in CA) at any AAA office, if you're a member.

Re: California DMV Loophole Allowed Jobs to Drive Sans-Plates

#60
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think most people who can afford $120k Mercedes vehicles really care who's driven them before. If it was a Ferrari driven by a rock star, maybe , but people who drive Benzes are generally boring and reasonable.

There is no such thing as a $120k used Mercedes, outside of a 65 or a Maybach. As for the boring and reasonable bit, search 'G550'.

A six-month-old, slightly used SL-class AMG? $120K is about right. They're $140K new.
Post reply on HN