Live data from Hacker News

GoodWill ransomware forces victims to donate to the poor

cloudsek.com

71–80 of 366 posts

Re: GoodWill ransomware forces victims to donate to the poor

#71
post #5

Hah, Black Mirror-esque. But well, hopefully it has a IP filter to not hit countries with universal healthcare. /s And asking stranger kids "Hey kids, want some KFC?"... that should go well. "The hacker 4chan made me do it!"

Black Mirror meets Mr. Robot. An interesting reality nevertheless.

or script kiddie meets open-source? or the dark side of open-source perhaps?

Mr.Robot is incredible show, Sam Esmail, Rami Malek and Christian Slater potentially created the top series of the decade, but this is not the reality.

Re: GoodWill ransomware forces victims to donate to the poor

#72
post #46

This thing was written by someone who doesn't live in a developed country... There's no way to do those actions in a developed country. Does this person think that just random children are available to be given food to?

Seriously. If I went up to a group of kids and offered to take them to pizza hut I think I’d probably be arrested.

Yeah, that’s going to be a hard one to explain…

Re: GoodWill ransomware forces victims to donate to the poor

#74

This thing was written by someone who doesn't live in a developed country... There's no way to do those actions in a developed country. Does this person think that just random children are available to be given food to?

The English is non idiomatic. Mistakes make it seem middle eastern/central asian

Re: GoodWill ransomware forces victims to donate to the poor

#75
That's an interesting name.

>The group’s multiple-paged ransom note suggests that victims perform three socially driven activities to be able to download the decryption key.

Wow, just that sentence alone makes a flood of memories come back.

(Purposefully doing my morning... executive time... in a place I never went when I was younger to get a fresh look at things.)

Just so everyone is on the same page, The Goodwill company is not good at all. They used to be, maybe, but they do this thing where they pay people less than minimum wage who often do their job better than folks with a "normal" IQ.

It was also widely known in my hometown if you donate to them, the employees pick off the good stuff so it rarely meets the shelves -- anyone who was a serious computer hobbyist would do deals on Craigslist, since unlike eBay, if someone just starts walking away with your device without paying you can physically stop them or call the cops.

I'm an enviornmentalist, I don't believe in getting the newest anything if the old works, so often I'd sell a previous device after doing my best to wipe the hard drive.

Only once did I have an issue on Craigslist, and it was after I had moved to a new state.

I had someone I sold a cracked iPhone threatening to sue me and a bunch of other nonsense. I told them the ad said as is, and I had assumed they were buying it for the parts, which they paid a more than fair price for, and that it was unsurprising that an iPhone with a cracked screen would fail, and they can meet me at kroger for their money back minus a restocking fee, like you'd expect at Best Buy, if they promise to never contact me again.

I picked Kroger because they had an armed security guard, and apparently literally doing the sale inside the lobby of a college town police station wasn't enough to send a message: I am operating in the open, I am giving you a fair deal, we are not friends, and I get very angry when I have to put a bunch of thought into how to convince someone to never make me feel unsafe again.

(I'd love to find an analyst role, but I don't know how you land those, my email is in my bio if anyone is having staffing issues and wants to make an offer.)

Re: GoodWill ransomware forces victims to donate to the poor

#76

This is probably obvious to anyone but there isn't anything "good" about this, I expected this to be something along the lines of a crypto donation to GiveDirectly but this is just a sick wannabe Blackmirror power play.

It's the specifics that give it away. "Take 5 poor children from your neighborhood to Pizza Hut."

Screaming kids at Pizza Hut aside, we can't make other people have empathy. They have to find it and explore it themselves, perhaps by seeing others do the same.

It's especially ironic that someone with lowered empathy would be demanding someone else show fake empathy publicly before giving them back control of their own computer.

Re: GoodWill ransomware forces victims to donate to the poor

#77

I can see a younger version of myself making something like this and intentionally letting it slip to the media for attention. I th8nk this line is telling: "Since there are no known victims/ targets for the ransomware group, their Tactics, Techniques and Procedures remain unknown." I don't think there's a risk if any great outbreak here. A bunch of scriptkiddies took some open source project and modified it with som…

Don't be dismissive of script kiddies, they can cause a lot of chaos, and often do it because they feel like no amount of self education or self improvement will improve their chances of stable full time employment.

(Hence many of them operating out of the former USSR.)

Re: GoodWill ransomware forces victims to donate to the poor

#79

I assumed the "goodwill" would be a donation to an association that would be a front for the hackers to get the money somehow, but it seems that it's really acts of goodwill with no real money flowing, so maybe the hackers actually believe they're doing good ?

Maybe someone should trace the flows and look for conflicts of interest.

Re: GoodWill ransomware forces victims to donate to the poor

#80

Has anyone actually completed the three demands and gotten their data back? As the requests are so bizarre and I'm so cynical it seems more likely they just want you to do silly things after destroying your data.

If word gets out that fullfilling those requests does not get your data back, no one would do it after the first attempt. For a no profit hack, honoring the promises would lead to funnier/more interesting situations.

Wouldn't an anti-ransomware group then hack some people, take their money, but not return the data, thereby undermining their real enemy, the ransomware groups?
Post reply on HN