Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is the GitHub home page distracting you from your work?

news.ycombinator.com

21–25 of 25 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is the GitHub home page distracting you from your work?

#21
post #8

I don't think I've ever looked at the GitHub homepage, I just sort of go directly to the project I want to look at (mine: URL completion, others: search results) Having looked at it now I don't think there's anything there of use to me, just a bunch of release updates. I guess this is different if you have open source projects issues to triage

Hi! GitHub PM here. What would be most useful for you to find on the home page? We're looking at revamping it. If easiest, feel free to follow up via email at siminapasat github.com. Thank you :)

Re: Ask HN: Is the GitHub home page distracting you from your work?

#23
post #19
post #12

I really never go to the GitHub home page. I’ve maybe been to GitHub.com five times in 15 years. I go directly to projects and I find projects 95% through word of mouth, coworkers, friends, articles and 5% through GitHub search. But my normal workflow is to go to work repos directly and do my job. I never go to my “feed” page but it shows every once in a while after I do stuff like transfer repos and it’s just a bunc…

Hi! GitHub PM here! We're looking at rethinking the home page to be most useful to people beyond the feed. How do you remember the repos to go to? Do you also have to go to other primitives on GitHub and if so do you rely on browser history? Would love to hear more about your workflow - if easiest please follow up via email siminapasat github.com. I appreciate your input! Thanks :)

I typically work in orgs so I either go to the org and search for the repo name. And sometimes I just click on the link in my email to the PR or whatnot. And sometimes I just look at “git remote -v” to see where the repo is.

I don’t use browser history or bookmarks and usually follow the above.

Re: Ask HN: Is the GitHub home page distracting you from your work?

#24
post #21
post #8

I don't think I've ever looked at the GitHub homepage, I just sort of go directly to the project I want to look at (mine: URL completion, others: search results) Having looked at it now I don't think there's anything there of use to me, just a bunch of release updates. I guess this is different if you have open source projects issues to triage

Hi! GitHub PM here. What would be most useful for you to find on the home page? We're looking at revamping it. If easiest, feel free to follow up via email at siminapasat github.com. Thank you :)

Honestly it's not so much the page is bad or missing anything, I've just never visited it outside of accidentally deleting the path from the URL or something. If I'm on GitHub I'm probably going to be going to a specific repo rather than browsing around

I'm not sure what would be there that could change this, probably not the right person to help, sorry!

Re: Ask HN: Is the GitHub home page distracting you from your work?

#25
post #21
post #8

I don't think I've ever looked at the GitHub homepage, I just sort of go directly to the project I want to look at (mine: URL completion, others: search results) Having looked at it now I don't think there's anything there of use to me, just a bunch of release updates. I guess this is different if you have open source projects issues to triage

Hi! GitHub PM here. What would be most useful for you to find on the home page? We're looking at revamping it. If easiest, feel free to follow up via email at siminapasat github.com. Thank you :)

A lot of space is wasted on the "cards" style scroll design. Which means I rapidly lose interest scrolling at all, I did it once, won't scroll down again.

The header with the "recommended based on people you follow" message is obtuse information i don't need to know. There would be more magic if the algorithm didn't say why this item was chosen for the feed. And the header style wastes space.

Invoking the soul of git is always the most conceptually pure design inspiration. therefore, git-relevant facts are always more effective than social-relevant facts.

// example

in : 2 commits: Removed unused code Refactored x function

// example

Released : Xth release since

//example

branched to a new branch .

//end examples

This would be a dense view of chronologically-relevant feed information that can be digested quickly.

The only other information that i find useful other than standard git data based information is 1. when readme.md is updated, and 2. when media is added to the readme of starred, watched, and algorithm-discovered repos.

When a commit of readme.md occurs, extract the markdown of the commit, render the markdown in a feed post with a link to the repo/readme, so i can read it in context.

Post reply on HN