Live data from Hacker News

Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safety reasons

bikebiz.com

711–720 of 797 posts

Re: Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safety reasons

#711
post #542

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the Netherlands we're doing fine without them though. Nobody wears one on a regular bike. I've had a few times where I slipped so fast I didn't even remember what happened but every time my arm was there protecting my head. Reflexes are awesome. Accidents can happen sure but the added hassle doesn't seem worth it. Of course things are different when you do high speed cycling or mountain biking.

" In absolute terms, more people were killed in a car accident (237) than in a bicycle accident (203) last year, but this is different per kilometre travelled. Traffic mortality per billion vehicle-km was much higher among cyclists than among passenger car occupants (11 versus 1.6 deaths). " ( https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2020/31/decline-in-road-fatali... )

Thing is, cyclists don't need to rack up as many kilometers as drivists. If you're riding a bike, you probably live in an urban place and you need only bike short distances.

Re: Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safety reasons

#712
post #424

I once saw an accident where a cyclist going straight through an intersection was hit by an oncoming truck turning left that was impatient, didn't see the cyclist and gunned it between cars. The cyclist was launched headfirst into the bumper of a car stopped at the light and her helmet loudly cracked in two. She was still hurt, but I'm sure she would have died without that helmet. If some riders choose to not wear a…

I had a near miss like this that really scared me in Vancouver. I was going straight, and the light went yellow just before I got to the intersection. Thinking like a car, I speed up to clear the intersection before the red light. An oncoming car in the left lane also sped up to make a left turn. I don't remember if he indicated, certainly I didn't see it. We both slammed on the brakes and narrowly missed each other.…

> My next realization was that it doesn't matter if I have the right of way and am dead.

This is a good realization for others to have before it takes a near death experience to change the view.

Re: Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safety reasons

#713
post #424

I once saw an accident where a cyclist going straight through an intersection was hit by an oncoming truck turning left that was impatient, didn't see the cyclist and gunned it between cars. The cyclist was launched headfirst into the bumper of a car stopped at the light and her helmet loudly cracked in two. She was still hurt, but I'm sure she would have died without that helmet. If some riders choose to not wear a…

I had a near miss like this that really scared me in Vancouver. I was going straight, and the light went yellow just before I got to the intersection. Thinking like a car, I speed up to clear the intersection before the red light. An oncoming car in the left lane also sped up to make a left turn. I don't remember if he indicated, certainly I didn't see it. We both slammed on the brakes and narrowly missed each other.…

A painted bicycle gutter is not dedication, it's lack of dedication from your local government.

Re: Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safety reasons

#714
post #427

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cycling is only risky due to the shared infrastructure with cars. The thing that raises the risk is cars. We should all be demanding that our streets are made safe for all users. We already have sidewalks in many places for this reason, we just need to extend similar safe infrastructure to bicycles and other road users too. Just throwing your hands up and not asking for change is a sure way to not improve things.

No one has ever been injured cycling on a trail! It’s amazing how the laws of physics no longer apply once you stop sharing infrastructure with motor vehicles. More seriously, you can easily hit a rock or something and go over the handlebars on a bike path.

A human being's weight hitting the ground at 30 mph (already a generously high figure) is far less serious than a multi-ton vehicle hitting them at 30 mph (already a generously low figure).

So, yes, physics.

Re: Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safety reasons

#715
post #532

Note, these are not normal bikes. From the article: > A major cause of head injuries is going over the handlebars, which is not possible with a 3 metre long bike. Another thing that makes us unique is our training systems, maintenance systems, and ability to track poor rider behaviour. Made me curious what they actually look like[0]. Seeing that, I’d tend to reset my presumptions about wearing helmets with these. The…

I'd like to wear helmet as a passenger as well as a driver on such bike. The helmet doesn't add almost any inconvenience, is reasonably cheap and light. Why not wear it? I use shared bikes one-way quite often and I usually carry my helmet around, strapped to a backpack. In colder weather I would cycle in a business shirt. No issue with a helmet.

> Why not wear it?

Car drivers often get head and brain injuries if they are involved in a collision with another car or with a tree/building. Do you wear a helmet when you drive? The helmet doesn't add almost any inconvenience, is reasonably cheap and light, as you say.

Unless you're on a racetrack or driving a test vehicle, probably not.

Re: Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safety reasons

#717

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a big difference between the speeds you travel at in a bowl and in very skating.

Speed doesn’t matter when you hit your head. I had a friend who fell while ice skating at the speed of a slow stroll, and hit the back of his head. He was dead a week later. And just getting a concussion can result in measurably decreased mental capabilities for months. Dad time: you’ve got one brain for your entire life. Stop relying on luck to keep it in working order.

> And just getting a concussion can result in measurably decreased mental capabilities for months.

Permanently, not months. All concussions result in some permanent damage, some moreso than others.

Re: Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safety reasons

#718
post #316

I once saw an accident where a cyclist going straight through an intersection was hit by an oncoming truck turning left that was impatient, didn't see the cyclist and gunned it between cars. The cyclist was launched headfirst into the bumper of a car stopped at the light and her helmet loudly cracked in two. She was still hurt, but I'm sure she would have died without that helmet. If some riders choose to not wear a…

Another such example is drivers or passengers opening cars' doors without looking in the mirrors. A car's doors are reinforced plenty while having relatively sharp-ish metal ‘lip’ on the butt end, and you really don't want to run into one from that angle.

I was launched about 20' by an abruptly opened car door. The paramedics thanked me for wearing a helmet; they only had to deliver me to the ER for seven stitches caused by that "lip."

Re: Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safety reasons

#719
post #627

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why is it okay for you to set the acceptable risk bar and steal boards from anyone that doesn't agree? For the same reason we enforce seatbelts in cars: Enough people died. Then those who saw them die decided on these rules so we don't need to go through the same pain. The fact that you don't get this shows that the rules work.

Interesting you should bring that up. That was used as an example of unintended side effects of policy in my economics class, because when people started wearing seat belts, they drove faster and more recklessly, so while the seatbelts protected people inside the cars, the number of pedestrians hit by cars went up. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_compensation

I take it you didn't actually read that wikipedia page. It says that the supposed Peltzman effect for seat belts didn't pan out.

Re: Pedal Me bans staff riders from wearing helmets for safety reasons

#720

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unlikely in the average but catastrophic to the individuals who lose the bet. Often society has to pay for the consequence to the victim. Which reminds me I need to get a helmet for my youngest, even though she's only a rider.

You should get them some full body Kevlar and chain mail as well. There are more shootings and stabbings than bicycle head injuries. Just to be safe.

Curious what sources you have.

Because several family members and I have experienced head injuries riding bicycles, none of us have been shot at or attacked with a knife. That said, I'm down for making all private gun possession illegal.

Post reply on HN