Live data from Hacker News

Engineer turns plastic into bricks that are reportedly stronger than concrete

peopleofcolorintech.com

141–150 of 197 posts

Re: Engineer turns plastic into bricks that are reportedly stronger than concrete

#141
post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would this be any worse for the environment than the petroleum in asphalt roads?

Or the carbon added to the air. Cars are... not good for the environment.

Electric cars powered with renewables solves that problem somewhat.

Re: Engineer turns plastic into bricks that are reportedly stronger than concrete

#142
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Asphalt also emits microparticles during wear and tear, as do tires... It needs to be tested, not assumed.

No you should assume it’s a problem until proven otherwise. We only have one environment and shoving anything we please into it without so much as a second thought is exactly what’s led us to our current predicament.

>until proven otherwise a.k.a. testing

Re: Engineer turns plastic into bricks that are reportedly stronger than concrete

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Might have been shredded-tire playground walkway material.

Not that soft. It looked like rigid concrete, but sagged a bit.

Was it in Detroit?

https://jalopnik.com/a-detroit-bridge-collapsed-under-a-mans...

Re: Engineer turns plastic into bricks that are reportedly stronger than concrete

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The bricks will aspirate toxic chemicals when exposed to direct sunlight: "...Plastics leached twice as much pollution in sunlight as in darkness, they found. One bag leached 263 different chemicals in the dark but more than 13,000 when exposed to light! Others leached even more. And the longer bags were exposed to sunlight, the more chemicals they leached. ..." https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/everyday…

Tried to look up "aspirate", but it didn't clarify: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/aspirate Note that "twice as much" doesn't mean it's a lot. Nor does the number of chemicals indicate danger.

In this context it means ''to suck in', 'to absorb'

Re: Engineer turns plastic into bricks that are reportedly stronger than concrete

#146
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because we need studies (ideally, funded by the same corporations that poison us) to tell us that having increasing quantities of plastic in our blood, lungs and other organs is bad. What happened I wonder to the precautionary principle? Maybe that's going to be our collective lamentation when we crash at warp speed into some sort of great filter.

I get the skepticism, but reality is complicated. Plastic saves lives, conserves energy, and makes the economy faster and better. Outright removal will be nothing short of impossible. Consumers don't want to be inconvenienced. Starbucks couldn't even keep non-plastic straws on without a massive amount of customer complaints. Plastic alternative materials science has a long way to go to even meet the same needs. There…

Plastic requires extraction and process of petrol which is neither clean nor energy efficient, it also requires heat to extrude and cooling to set and release from molding. Plastics have also contributed greatly to a disposable approach to consumer products instead of durable or reusable. Lastly plastics are highly detrimental to the environment as they as and breakdown into smaller plastics that contaminate the food chain. To call them lifesaving is a farce.

Re: Engineer turns plastic into bricks that are reportedly stronger than concrete

#147
post #17

I bet sourcing all that sand will be a bigger problem than they expect as sand is a rare and nonrenewable resource that's heavily in demand for concrete and sourcing it has all sorts of environmental issues of its own. They should look into replacing that with something that's also cheap waste. Maybe crushed glass would work?

twenty-five percent of Africa is literally covered in sand. Sand comes in different granularity and compositions, but for concrete this is often irrelevant.

Re: Engineer turns plastic into bricks that are reportedly stronger than concrete

#148

Mixing plastics with asphalt has been tried for roads in India for many years now. There is one stretch near where I live which was done 10+ years ago. There is an official policy on trying this, as a pilot, for any agency that wishes to use it. See: https://www.prakati.in/use-of-plastic-for-road-construction-... The road which I use occasionally seems reasonably good as roads go. Unless you see the boards informing…

[deleted]

Re: Engineer turns plastic into bricks that are reportedly stronger than concrete

#150
post #17

I bet sourcing all that sand will be a bigger problem than they expect as sand is a rare and nonrenewable resource that's heavily in demand for concrete and sourcing it has all sorts of environmental issues of its own. They should look into replacing that with something that's also cheap waste. Maybe crushed glass would work?

twenty-five percent of Africa is literally covered in sand. Sand comes in different granularity and compositions, but for concrete this is often irrelevant.

Actually it matters quite a bit. That's why countries which are literally filled with desert sand import river/sea sand for their construction. Finding a way to make desert sand usable for construction concrete would be significant.
Post reply on HN