Live data from Hacker News

Y Combinator's Message to Founders

twitter.com

51–60 of 264 posts

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#51

I am currently graduating with a CS degree and interpreting this as a warning to not accept the offer from the exciting startup and instead accept the offer from the big corporate fintech company. Is there any reason I could be wrong?

A simple question to ask: Are you willing and/or able to potentially wait 6+ months for a new job if the startup goes under? Hiring for entry level engineers is already difficult and becomes much harder when companies institute hiring freezes due to an economic downturn.

Take the safer option, weather out the recession and if you find an exciting startup you can join them with confidence that even if they fall apart you'll have the experience to find the next job much faster.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#52

Companies that have a good ideas and provide needed product/services will survive. I think the era of stupid money chasing silly ideas are over. Same thing happened at the end of the dot-com era.

>I think the era of stupid money chasing silly ideas are over. Same thing happened at the end of the dot-com era.

It's called the Business Cycle. Those days are not over, they're merely hibernating

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#53
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the time for you to take the maximum possible risks. Usually as you get older your appetite for risk decreases. Ergo, take that startup offer. You will always have a job as a programmer.

> This is the time for you to take the maximum possible risks. Usually as you get older your appetite for risk decreases. Taking risks for the sake of increasing risk is a combination of naive and stupid. Increased risk taking must come with an increasing reward. In an economic collapse and likely recession, having a stable job at a large established company would give you stability and, soon enough, capital for buyi…

> Working at a startup does not magically make you a better programmer any more than working at a large company automatically turns you into a cog churning out Java beans.

Working at a startup has a far better learning curve and better feedback about your rate of learning compared to a large company.

Buying up capital for home and basement prices is not a part of my equation at all.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#54
post #18

Dagnabit. Here we go again - this is a fantastic, pragmatic amendment to those notes -> https://dalton.substack.com/p/letter-to-myself-in-late-2008?... For a taste: "Doing multiple small layoffs is a form of cascading failure. Do one layoff, but much much deeper than seems correct. Do it decisively. Do it so that you get profitable. In your case that is something like a 70% cut, not a 5-10% cut. Yes you read that rig…

> a 70% cut...Cutting once and cutting hard allows you to reassure the people that are still here that you are truly profitable

If your employees are dumb enough that they interpret a 70% cut of the workforce as a sign that your company is stable, you're doomed. It's hard to imagine the dumbest person in the world interpreting that as a sign of stability.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#56

I am currently graduating with a CS degree and interpreting this as a warning to not accept the offer from the exciting startup and instead accept the offer from the big corporate fintech company. Is there any reason I could be wrong?

Take the safe job when you are old and have family/dependents. Take the long shot bets when you are young. You have the potential to learn way more way more quickly at a startup and if it folds you are still young and have experience. I wish I would have taken this advice when I was 25...

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#57
post #18

Dagnabit. Here we go again - this is a fantastic, pragmatic amendment to those notes -> https://dalton.substack.com/p/letter-to-myself-in-late-2008?... For a taste: "Doing multiple small layoffs is a form of cascading failure. Do one layoff, but much much deeper than seems correct. Do it decisively. Do it so that you get profitable. In your case that is something like a 70% cut, not a 5-10% cut. Yes you read that rig…

A 70% cut is a great way to kill your company once the remaining 30% start jumping ship. Either because of the destroyed morale or because they're doing a lot more work in a higher stress environment.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#58
post #56

I am currently graduating with a CS degree and interpreting this as a warning to not accept the offer from the exciting startup and instead accept the offer from the big corporate fintech company. Is there any reason I could be wrong?

Take the safe job when you are old and have family/dependents. Take the long shot bets when you are young. You have the potential to learn way more way more quickly at a startup and if it folds you are still young and have experience. I wish I would have taken this advice when I was 25...

But don't spend all your money! You have very few obligations when you are young. Basically feed yourself and pay rent. Save the rest. You will thank yourself when you are 50, because you can't catch up if you wait until then.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#59
https://nitter.kavin.rocks/refsrc/status/1527238287471292417

OCR'd text:

4:11

Greetings YC Founders,

During this week we've done office hours with a large number of YC companies. They reached out to ask whether they should change their plans around spending, runway, hiring, and funding rounds based on the current state of public markets. What we've told them is that economic downturns often become huge opportunities for the founders who quickly change their mindset, plan ahead, and make sure their company survives. Here are some thoughts to consider when making your plans:

1. No one cannot predict how bad the economy will get, but things don't look good.

2. The safe move is to plan for the worst. If the current situation is as bad as the last two economic downturns, the best way to prepare is to cut costs and extend your runway within the next 30 days. Your goal should be to get to Default Alive.[1]

3. If you don't have the runway to reach default alive and your existing investors or new investors are willing to give you more money right now (even on the same terms as your last round) you should strongly consider taking it.

4. Regardless of your ability to fundraise, it's your responsibility to ensure your company will survive if you cannot raise money for the next 24 months.

5. Understand that the poor public market performance of tech companies significantly impacts VC investing. VCs will have a much harder time raising money and their LPs will expect more investment discipline. As a result, during economic downturns even the top tier VC funds with a lot of money slow down their deployment of capital (lesser funds often stop investing or die). This causes less competition between funds for deals which results in lower valuations, lower round sizes, and many fewer deals completed. In these situations, investors also reserve more capital to backstop their best performing companies, which further reduces the number of new financings.

This slow down will have a disproportionate impact on international companies, asset heavy companies, low margin companies, hardtech, and other companies with high burn long time to revenue.

Note that the numbers of meetings investors take don't decrease in proportion to the reduction in total investment. It's easy to be fooled into thinking a fund is actively investing when it is not.

6. For those of you who have started your company within the last 5 years, question what you believe to be the normal fundraising environment. Your fundraising experience was most likely not normal and future fundraises will be much more difficult.

7. If you are post Series A and pre-product market fit,[2] don't expect another round to happen at all until you have obviously hit product market fit. The Series A Milestones[3] we publish here might even turn out to be a bit too low.

8. If your plan is to raise money in the next 6-12 months, you might be raising at the peak of the downturn. Remember that your chances of success are extremely low even if your company is doing well. We recommend you change your plan.

9. Remember, that many of your competitors will not plan well, maintain high burn, and only figure out they are screwed when they try to raise their next round. You can often pick up significant market share in an economic downturn by just staying alive.

10. For more thoughts watch this video we've created: Save Your Startup during an Economic Downturn.[4]

Best,

YC

________________________________

Notes:

Presumed links (I do not have a copy of the original message). See also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31436244

1. Default Alive: http://www.paulgraham.com/aord.html

2. Pre-product market fit: See: https://www.ycombinator.com/blog/ycs-essential-startup-advic... "do things that don’t scale: remain small/nimble"

3. Series A Milestones: Presumably private.

4. Save Your Startup during an Economic Downturn: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=0OVSTWozvfY?vq=hd720

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#60

Going to be interesting to see which free plans get cut, prices skyrocket, or what companies stop having "open core" software. Growth hacks like these have always traded revenue instead of cash for advertising/exposure, and I think it gave well-capitalized companies too much of an edge where they can effectively give things away and undercut competitors who are trying to be sustainable. Would've also been interesting…

The guidance for crypto startups might be to fold and return investor money. There are a few ideas which seem "interesting" such as enterprise blockchains for bank accounting, or smart contracts for inter-bank contracts. These help large financial institutions prove to auditors that they met their contractual obligations and no funny business happened. BTC will probably stabilize as a tradeable store of value as a hedge against "unfriendly" governments.

But there is a huge sea of blockchain startups which are trading alt-coins, or providing trading analytics software/exchanges for alt-coins, or simply making coins which have vague differentiators, or whatever web3 is supposed to be. I suspect that any crypto company that doesn't have a specific use case that customers pay for will struggle for the next few years.

Post reply on HN