Live data from Hacker News

Y Combinator's Message to Founders

twitter.com

21–30 of 264 posts

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#21
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lots of startups provide needed products and services. I don't think that's enough. They need to provide needed products/services in a way that can be sold/marketed profitably, and scaled profitably.

Yes. I always need 1 dollar for 95 cents.

You joke, but a 5% ROI isn't bad YoY in the long run. Especially if it's low risk.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#22

I am currently graduating with a CS degree and interpreting this as a warning to not accept the offer from the exciting startup and instead accept the offer from the big corporate fintech company. Is there any reason I could be wrong?

You should definitely ask lots of questions about a startup's operations, revenue situation, funding status, etc. before you join, no matter what the economic circumstances. You should also consider whether the big company might have large layoffs soon. Which one you should choose depends very much on the specifics of the companies, as well as your financial situation, career goals, and personal temperament.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#23

I am currently graduating with a CS degree and interpreting this as a warning to not accept the offer from the exciting startup and instead accept the offer from the big corporate fintech company. Is there any reason I could be wrong?

Choosing between a startup vs a big corporate is a separate topic. There are advantages and disadvantages to each. In essence you trade learning for stability. It really depends on what you are looking for and type of environment you want to be in. If you have done the calculus and are more interested in a startup I would recommend asking what the run rate of the company is and do they have any plans to hit profitability.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#24

I am currently graduating with a CS degree and interpreting this as a warning to not accept the offer from the exciting startup and instead accept the offer from the big corporate fintech company. Is there any reason I could be wrong?

It depends. You just need to do more due diligence and ask harder questions to that exciting startup, especially around burn rate, and profitability goals.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#26

Translation: as has been the case since the dawn of capitalism, companies going forward will have to turn a real, liquid profit from selling an actual good or service. Gone are the (highly anomalous) days of starting a purposefully unprofitable company whose only path towards “profitability” is a) getting acquired or b) endless rounds of VC funding.

>> starting a purposefully unprofitable company whose only path towards “profitability” is a) getting acquired or b) endless rounds of VC funding.

and worst of all, c)pursuing a predatory pricing strategy to monopolize the market and crowd out competitors.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#27
post #8

Companies that have a good ideas and provide needed product/services will survive. I think the era of stupid money chasing silly ideas are over. Same thing happened at the end of the dot-com era.

> I think the era of stupid money chasing silly ideas are over It's quite possible that this era of that is over, but I'll eat my hat if another era of stupid money chasing silly ideas doesn't spring up within a decade.

“Yeah, but this time it's different!” - Someone in 5-10 years.

Re: Y Combinator's Message to Founders

#29
post #26

Translation: as has been the case since the dawn of capitalism, companies going forward will have to turn a real, liquid profit from selling an actual good or service. Gone are the (highly anomalous) days of starting a purposefully unprofitable company whose only path towards “profitability” is a) getting acquired or b) endless rounds of VC funding.

>> starting a purposefully unprofitable company whose only path towards “profitability” is a) getting acquired or b) endless rounds of VC funding. and worst of all, c)pursuing a predatory pricing strategy to monopolize the market and crowd out competitors.

Yup. I think that fits under b), since it’s only possible to run out the clock on competitors with a predatory pricing strategy with endless rounds of VC funding.
Post reply on HN