Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why? Because it’s higher than you’re used to seeing? You don’t even know what role that person was applying for. Is your position that 380k is just “too high”, period? Perhaps because the company lost half a billion dollars last quarter and is in a controversial space facing regulatory scrutiny? > That number (or higher) has been the norm at a huge swath of stable and profitable tech companies for a decade+. Yeah,…
> Perhaps because the company lost half a billion dollars last quarter So what? Last year COIN made $3.62B earnings. They may need to shift at some point, but I think it's incorrect to act like 1-2 bad quarters means a company should completely shift their plan. If anything, it's more important than ever to hire top people - which requires a decent salary.
These are not "top people", they are average people. This isn't Lake Wobegon, where all the kids are above average.
>So what? Last year COIN made $3.62B earnings.
Only in Silicon Valley do people say "so what" to profits and quote revenue numbers. We're literally talking about high costs. Selling dimes for a nickel is simple, but not sustainable.