Earlier quoted context omitted.
That would probably help, but it's also a continuation of the cat and mouse game. There are plenty of captcha breaking services out there, it only cost about $1 to programmatically solve 1000 captchas.
Sure, but it increases friction that forces a re-eval of cost/benefit of the bot(s). Newest captcha services are a prediction score, not even a verification screen, and you can feed polluting data to bots you are certain to exist.
Almost all searches on my independent search engine are now from SEO spam bots
291–300 of 391 posts
Re: Almost all searches on my independent search engine are now from SEO spam bots
#292Earlier quoted context omitted.
How exactly is a "general purpose search engine" different than a "search engine to try and find some of the fun and interesting content"?
The general purpose search engines search the whole internet, and as a result claim that you can search for anything on the whole internet, even going beyond that to answer questions which aren't on the internet as such, e.g. "What is my IP?" and "What time is it?". However, niche search engines only search specific parts of the internet, and only claim to be able to deliver results relating to their specific topic,…
You need to find an actual niche that solves a real problem people have and can understand and orient everything you do to tackling that. Then expand from there.
Re: Almost all searches on my independent search engine are now from SEO spam bots
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or put those query results behind an anti-bot/"capcha" test.
That would probably help, but it's also a continuation of the cat and mouse game. There are plenty of captcha breaking services out there, it only cost about $1 to programmatically solve 1000 captchas.
Re: Almost all searches on my independent search engine are now from SEO spam bots
#294Usually quality blog posts on specific technical topics are just things I run across through HN, lobsters, or twitter. Now it's one more channel to look for things that I'm specifically researching, like CRDTs. Kudos!
Re: Almost all searches on my independent search engine are now from SEO spam bots
#295Since everyone in this thread wants to jump down OP's throat about the quality of his web site, another interesting search engine is millionshort.com, which allows you to filter out the top N web sites from the results of your search. It's a great tool for looking past sites with good SEO; all you have to do is fiddle with the value of N. For example, searching for "electronic music box" as /u/ajnin suggested, with t…
Re: Almost all searches on my independent search engine are now from SEO spam bots
#296This made me curious to try that search engine so I typed "electronic music box" (first thing that came to mind). As far as I can tell none or the 10+ pages of results include all those 3 words. I mean, you might not have any relevant sites in your database (likely if there are only 1000 sites or so as another of your blog posts imply), and I understand you want to show some result to the user, but if I want irreleva…
Re: Almost all searches on my independent search engine are now from SEO spam bots
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is a comparison of document management systems something you expect actually find, as something written by humans? I wouldn't write such an article, I don't know who would. The only people who seem to be writing these types of comparison articles are spammers. I typed this reply without checking, but I checked now, and yeah -- if you google "document management system comparison", you get ads for document management…
2nd result I got from that exact search is an article from techradar: https://www.techradar.com/uk/best/best-document-management-s... Do you consider that search engine spam?
The deal on DocuWare is perhaps the most obvious, but the Abbyy-link also run through an affiliate marketing redirect service.
Re: Almost all searches on my independent search engine are now from SEO spam bots
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, but it increases friction that forces a re-eval of cost/benefit of the bot(s). Newest captcha services are a prediction score, not even a verification screen, and you can feed polluting data to bots you are certain to exist.
Agreed. I suspect that this is an arbitrage game on the part of the SEO spammers. Each search is cheaper for them than it is for a competitor who's using a major search engine with more extensive anti-spammer protections, and that difference equals $$$. A captcha doesn't have to be an unbeatable solution. It just has to provide enough of a barrier to equalize the cost.
For OP, I think simply not returning results at all is a more practical measure because it removes the reward completely. Captchas and bot detection keep the reward in play, while taking away the results entirely makes the entire pursuit futile.
Re: Almost all searches on my independent search engine are now from SEO spam bots
#299Even back in the Open Directory Days when we powered part of search.netscape.com I estimated 80+% of all search traffic was automated. At least most of it self-identified with the same Java useragent.
Later when working Topix, despite being a news search engine, most traffic was bot traffic. Most included the word “mortgage” in the query. Topix specialized in localized content, and that was very popular for SEO scrapers.
Lastly at Blekko, I estimate 90+% of traffic was automated. By then maybe half or more learned to change the user agent. Most used HTTP/1.0, a dead giveaway as no browser still uses 1.0. This was a major aspect in Blekko's load shedding strategy. If the servers started to get overloaded, we'd start bouncing suspected bot traffic to a redirect that would show in the logs. If there was a human with a modern browser running javascript on the other end, would get redirect to a link that wouldn't get bounced. I would check the logs weekly to see if any humans got caught. None ever did. This was a huge monetary savings, you only need 1/10th the servers if you can safely ignore the bots.
Often it's endless repetition of the same keywords in a random order with a place name appended, or prepended, or inserted. over and over. Often variations on known monetizatable SEO keywords. However, much of it doesn't make any sense.
I don't have any insight into Google's numbers but I would conservatively estimate 95% or more of all their queries are automated bots and not humans. And the level of spy-vs-spy going on for Google CPU resources vs SEO bots is probably pretty evolved by now. I stopped tracking many years ago when Google switched to densely packed obfuscated javascript for page renders. Maybe this is part of why automated queries are so high across the web, maybe google is too hard to crack for most.