I am very skeptical of the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) images because they are not following a scientific method that results in a true representative image of their target. In my opinion astronomy is jumping the shark with these images by making this a big PR stunt. I've looked at their methods for their earlier images and they seem to be hunting for a circle that looks like a black hole in their data. The EHT's f…
Why do you think you know more about astronomy than a team of scientists publishing peer reviewed information?
Astronomers reveal first image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy
161–170 of 329 posts
Re: Astronomers reveal first image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy
#162Can the smart people in here confirm if we are getting sucked into this someday or not?
Roughly speaking, the sun orbits the galactic center at a velocity of 220km/s. To fall into, or to be sucked into, the central black hole would require the loss of all this velocity, which means applying acceleration to the sun opposite the direction of its orbit. Lots of acceleration. That has to come from somewhere.
I suppose there's some extremely tiny amount of drag that occurs due to the sun moving in the interstellar medium, but aside from that there's not a lot that applies acceleration to the sun opposite the direction of its orbit. Really the only other thing that comes to mind are the gravitational waves that are radiated by co-rotating objects. This is the effect that causes close by black holes to eventually come close enough that they merge. But in objects traveling at slower speeds in larger orbits, this effect is also negligible on the scale of billions of years. (These are the gravitational waves observed by LIGO). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-body_problem_in_general_re...
Re: Astronomers reveal first image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy
#163Can the smart people in here confirm if we are getting sucked into this someday or not?
Re: Astronomers reveal first image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
The resolution of these telescopes is limited by diffraction, not by the number of pixels on the sensors. The achievable angular resolution is roughly the wavelength divided by the aperture diameter [1]. JWST works in the few µm wavelength range and has a 6.5 m aperture, such that the angular resolution is ~0.1 arcsec. The EHT works with 1.3 mm wavelength and has an effective aperture of roughly the earth diameter (~…
Should have clarified. Does a black hole have fuzzy edges or sharp edges?
Re: Astronomers reveal first image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy
#165For those wondering if we could get sharper images with JWST, here’s the previously imaged black hole (same angular size as our own) compared to a single pixel from Hubble’s wide field camera 3: https://twitter.com/alex_parker/status/1116070667068170240?s... JWST will have smaller “pixels” but is in the same ballpark.
Re: Astronomers reveal first image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy
#166One of the findings they announced at the press conference is that the spin of the black hole is not aligned with the galactic plane but is tilted "towards us" so that it is viewed face on. How unexpected is that?
For a small-mass central black hole (CBH), the spin-spin coupling of the CBH and the bulk matter of a relatively small and sparse galaxy is so small that it the orientation of the spin axis is almost unconstrained. That from Earth we look down on the CBH's north pole (right-hand-rule: the bright features appear to circulate counter-clockwise, and there is decent evidence in them that the black hole's spin is in the s…
Re: Astronomers reveal first image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
You realize peer review isn't just something you do and they automatically publish you, right? Peer review makes sure your science is sound. But I'm sure you're more of an expert than anybody serving in a peer review board.
Peer review has let plenty of bad science through. Don't burn me at the stake because I speak heresy against the holy theologians of astronomy.
Re: Astronomers reveal first image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy
#168Re: Astronomers reveal first image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
GR and quantum field theory don't work together, so at least one of them is wrong, and it would be good to figure out which and how.
Thanks. Can you please point me to some popular science article that explains why the two do not agree with each other?
Re: Astronomers reveal first image of the black hole at the heart of our galaxy
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
They collected data on both back in 2017. It took until now to develop the image processing techniques to account for the rapid changes in the accretion disk around Sag.A*.
Ah, so they didn't release an image of it back then? Or was it just a less precise image? Thought I saw one but can't find it now among all these newly release images. Thanks BTW