When push comes to shove, getting Nokia to treat WP7 as a first-tier platform would have bought Microsoft just as big a win as Nokia going all-in. I'd argue it might even have been a bigger win because Nokia would look much less like a rudderless ship about to crash. Maybe Elop didn't negotiate hard enough, maybe he didn't have the vision, or maybe he was too influenced by his time at Microsoft. We'll probably never know.
Is Nokia's CEO a Microsoft mole?
61–70 of 88 posts
Re: Is Nokia's CEO a Microsoft mole?
#62at a conference i talked with some nokia devs, two funny stories. 1) the N9 (the meego phone) will never be released in an english speaking country as marketing fears the tech blogger will write even more crap about their strategy change - as it is a quiete decent phone 2) even though the code for the N9 they do not get any test devices, the code in a very rudimentary ide only, as there is a no Meego phone for devs a…
Pretty much nothing. Disclaimer: I work as a software engineer at Nokia. Australia is very much an English speaking country (although we are at the ass-end of the world), and the N9 is getting a lot of active marketing here [1, 2]. I have also been working on the software for the N9, but most of my development has been on device, either on the N950 or the N9. We always grumble that we don't get enough devices, but th…
Re: Is Nokia's CEO a Microsoft mole?
#63Re: Is Nokia's CEO a Microsoft mole?
#64Re: Is Nokia's CEO a Microsoft mole?
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Nokia board of directors probably hired Elop because they wanted to transition to Windows Phone. Elop's job was to the bearer of bad news (to employees).
I was under the impression that they wanted to transition to Windows Phone or Android. Anything to help them become/stay competitive in the mobile space.
Re: Is Nokia's CEO a Microsoft mole?
#66Summary: journalist visits a Nokia software development site in Tampere, where everybody used to work on two mobile operating systems that Nokia is phasing out. Understandably, these people are not particularly willing to admit that the software they spent years on wasn't good enough to keep up with Apple and Google, so the old conspiracy theory plops up: the Nokia CEO must be a "mole" who's intentionally driving the…
Re: Is Nokia's CEO a Microsoft mole?
#67Summary: journalist visits a Nokia software development site in Tampere, where everybody used to work on two mobile operating systems that Nokia is phasing out. Understandably, these people are not particularly willing to admit that the software they spent years on wasn't good enough to keep up with Apple and Google, so the old conspiracy theory plops up: the Nokia CEO must be a "mole" who's intentionally driving the…
This long article does a much better job of explaining matters than the link-bait here. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_24/b42320567... This guy has atleast a plan after Nokia realized it needs a big shake, unlike RIM which is in a similar situation but burning it's hands with 'me-too' tablets that no one wants and handwaving about the awesomeness of QNX instead of pivoting quickly before it's too lat…
Sorry but if the richness of the ecosystem is the main reason for change, then the obvious answer is Android.
Re: Is Nokia's CEO a Microsoft mole?
#68Better yet is this question: MS value has decreased at least a 3rd since Ballmer got control..is Ballmer a mole ? Same exact logic problems as the article..except mine has more flair and imagination
Is Ballmer a mole for Procter & Gamble?
Re: Is Nokia's CEO a Microsoft mole?
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
"How about MeeGo Harmattan, which is said to be even ahead of iOS in terms of usability, performance and polish." "which is said"? Who said?
I agree that it is too optimistic (see my other comment) but I was dissapointed that I can't swype in iPad.
Or maybe I'm downvoted only because I insulted all iOS device owners by saying that their device is not coolest gadget anymore...
Re: Is Nokia's CEO a Microsoft mole?
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
This long article does a much better job of explaining matters than the link-bait here. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_24/b42320567... This guy has atleast a plan after Nokia realized it needs a big shake, unlike RIM which is in a similar situation but burning it's hands with 'me-too' tablets that no one wants and handwaving about the awesomeness of QNX instead of pivoting quickly before it's too lat…
So for that reason they decided to go into the rich Windows Mobile ecosystem? What kind of installed base is there for Windows Mobile nowadays? 5.7% and falling steadily. Sorry but if the richness of the ecosystem is the main reason for change, then the obvious answer is Android.