I've recently heard about this YouTube account named Roel Van De Paar. If you've looked up any error message on YouTube recently, you've probably run into him. Because of the "no dislikes" change, he's everywhere now. And by everywhere, I mean EVERYWHERE. The account has over 2 million videos. Approximately 0.2% of ALL videos on the ENTIRE platform of YouTube can be attributed to this account, and if you check now th…
No Dislikes has officially ruined YouTube for me
191–200 of 498 posts
Re: No Dislikes has officially ruined YouTube for me
#192I watch YouTube without logging in. The quality of recommendations I get is pretty good. I would say that I get very different recommendations on different browsers at different times so your mileage may vary.
2. Search. YT search is ... reasonable. Not great, but it typically turns up what you want.
3. Incognito mode *ONLY*.
4. Invidious, if at all possible.
5. Watch, or more often, listen, through a third-party client. I generally "experience" YouTube via mpv. I'll cue up a list of URLs I'm interested in. This is the most effective and convenient way of curating a playlist I'm aware of. VLC can also play YT video directly. (Both support many, many, many other sites and formats, typically through yt-dlp or youtube-dl).
6. When using the YT client itself, disable comments and suggestions through a CSS manager, or uBlock Origin's "block element" feature.
Benefits:
- No ads
- No idiotic recommendations
- No tracking and pigeonholing
- No comments (excepting Invidious, though that offers the option of YT or Reddit comments should you prefer)
Re: No Dislikes has officially ruined YouTube for me
#193What I noticed is how sterile and sanitised the comments are. You don't see any negative comments anymore. Also if you search you will get random unrelated videos mixed with your results.
Thanks, "growth hackers", for maximizing "engagement".
Re: No Dislikes has officially ruined YouTube for me
#194For me, Youtube ruined... ads. All ads for the past several months have been about Indian pop music, and I'm not even Indian. Something broke in their algorithm (I'm from Eastern Europe). Not that I really cared about ads, and if you think about it, I actually learned something new, there's some nice Indian music I wouldn't otherwise have learned about.
Re: No Dislikes has officially ruined YouTube for me
#195 Before: +1000 / -600 (What the heck?)
After: +400 (Looks good, isn't it?)
Votes are not an elaborate critique but they can provide the posters and viewers a hint. Regarding elaborate critique, it usually hurts and is hard to accept. But I can learn from it! And again, votes are a hint. Regarding Stackoverflow, they did a good thing in limiting upvotes a little (prevents overuse without justification) and downvotes (hurts you're own reputation). This makes me think twice ;)Re: No Dislikes has officially ruined YouTube for me
#196Re: No Dislikes has officially ruined YouTube for me
#197Well, isn't this a product of the engagement-/advertisement-/"likes"-driven society online we've moved towards or incentivized thanks to technology? It doesn't matter that something was downvoted as useless or just plain factually incorrect by a certain number of people. If enough other people found it worth upvoting as entertaining or feel-good enough for the couple minutes of their time, that's more important to th…
Re: No Dislikes has officially ruined YouTube for me
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
where does the extension get the data from, though? it's not like they just have to remove a `display: none` somewhere.
The dislike count is still in the data returned by the YouTube API[0], so they're probably getting it from there. [0] https://developers.google.com/youtube/analytics/metrics#disl...
And your other comment says "The dislike count is also still present in the [0] video API response." but the page says right there "Note: The statistics.dislikeCount property was made private as of December 13, 2021."
Re: No Dislikes has officially ruined YouTube for me
#199get the extension "BlockTube" and block any channel that does this. after a while your feed will get noticably better. People are saying not to click but IMO it doesn't work that well. I make a point of never clicking on any video title like that, and still kept getting flooded My favorite pattern is saying "THIS" and withholding what exactly the video is about - once I saw it used twice in a title and it just cracke…
> block any channel that does this Isn't there an endless supply of such channels? Or does YouTube notice your lack of engagement?
Of course, there's enough channel-churn that these do turn over relatively quickly, but that tends to be on the scale of weeks to months, not hours to days.
Once you've knocked off the major chum sites, legitimate channels start rising through the noise floor. The small-scale chum sites tend not to turn up in high rotation.
Channel-block should be an inherent function. Web search also desperately needs this at the domain level.
(I just ran into this looking up a hiking trail. First-listed site, which dominated my search results, splashes up a registration wall on following any links. Peakbagger, buried in the search results, does far better. I also had to block Pinterest, of course....)
Re: No Dislikes has officially ruined YouTube for me
#200I've recently heard about this YouTube account named Roel Van De Paar. If you've looked up any error message on YouTube recently, you've probably run into him. Because of the "no dislikes" change, he's everywhere now. And by everywhere, I mean EVERYWHERE. The account has over 2 million videos. Approximately 0.2% of ALL videos on the ENTIRE platform of YouTube can be attributed to this account, and if you check now th…
His "latest" video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtqJq0OF8eA
Is a poorly generated copy/paste of: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1644...
Probably a tiny Python script. Google is prompt to ban other accounts, hope some Googlers around here can can do something...