Quordle’s a great alternative.
A Note About Today’s Wordle Game
11–20 of 53 posts
Re: A Note About Today’s Wordle Game
#12Re: A Note About Today’s Wordle Game
#13Re: A Note About Today’s Wordle Game
#14Sooo, “fetus” is a word dangerous enough that it requires a 350 word explainer article to accompany it?
I am surprised that they are not stating the word explicitly, only vaguely as "closely connected to a major recent news event" ("He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named" comes to mind as an association) Edit: the wording was updated to be more constructive
Re: A Note About Today’s Wordle Game
#15In case there's a paywall for the editor's note: the tl;dr is that today's word was originally supposed to be "FETUS". Last week the NYT noticed this and made a change, but this change wouldn't propagate to all the Wordle players who still have the cached word list in their browsers. Full text below: It’s been just over three months since The New York Times acquired Wordle, the hugely popular puzzle created by Josh W…
I understand that NYT didn't want to step in it, and it was probably a smart decision, but I'd love to live in a world where the editor chose to say, "Well, we defined that word list many months ago and it happened to come up today. The public reaction to today's Wordle simply emphasizes the fact that words, even a single word, matter."
Re: A Note About Today’s Wordle Game
#16Re: A Note About Today’s Wordle Game
#17The source code seemed extremely simple, but somehow they messed it up so it’s impossible for them to change a word in time. Am I understanding this correctly?
Re: A Note About Today’s Wordle Game
#18Re: A Note About Today’s Wordle Game
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am surprised that they are not stating the word explicitly, only vaguely as "closely connected to a major recent news event" ("He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named" comes to mind as an association) Edit: the wording was updated to be more constructive
They’re trying not to spoil the puzzle?
Re: A Note About Today’s Wordle Game
#20Sooo, “fetus” is a word dangerous enough that it requires a 350 word explainer article to accompany it?