Precisions: * GPS: 2.00—8.76 m * GLONASS: 4.46—7.38 m * GPS+GLONASS: 2.37—4.65 m [citation needed] (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLONASS ).
Some modern receivers are able to use both GLONASS and GPS
satellites together, providing greatly improved coverage in
urban canyons and giving a very fast time to fix due to over
50 satellites being available. In indoor, urban canyon or
mountainous areas, accuracy can be greatly improved over
using GPS alone.
Is there any reason, other than the higher number of sources, why GPS+GLONASS is better than just GPS in these situation? I.e. Is GLONASS better in these sorts of environments?