Earlier quoted context omitted.
We have been using it for 6-7 years now. Have been able to run very stable and integrated a lot of external IdP's to offer proper SSO on mulitple of our software stacks. Added a lot of other open source pieces of software we run for our backoffice needs (hashi vault, adminbro, etc.). So far very happy with it. Running in clustered mode without issues and as such little issues with the startup times. It probably helps…
This fascinated me - where and how does this fit into other identity providers (and thence into SSO). I kind of yearn for client certificates everywhere simply because I can grok how that remains secure as we pass through layer after layer. the rest I just worry about
Keycloak: Open-Source Identity and Access Management
21–30 of 243 posts
Re: Keycloak: Open-Source Identity and Access Management
#22Does it support webAuthn?
Re: Keycloak: Open-Source Identity and Access Management
#23Does it support webAuthn?
Re: Keycloak: Open-Source Identity and Access Management
#24While Keycloak is a great out-of-the-box solution, my #1 complaint at the time was how heavyweight it was, which was a burden for development, followed closely by its packaging as a J2EE app and bundling with Wildfly (at the time).
This meant we needed to know not only about Keycloak itself, but also about Wildfly's special quirks, the clustering system (Infinispan??), Java and Docker.
Now it's packaged with Quarkus, which is another dependency to learn about, and to be honest despite the quality of the finished product, all those dependencies have become pretty off-putting.
So while I can recommend Keycloak's functionality, if you're not already deploying Java apps as part of your job, I suspect it will present a pretty serious administrative burden to deploy into serious production.
Re: Keycloak: Open-Source Identity and Access Management
#25We are currently using Shibboleth, and would love to get away from using java/Tomcat. It looks like Keycloak also uses java. Is there an alternative to this that doesn't require it?
Re: Keycloak: Open-Source Identity and Access Management
#26Re: Keycloak: Open-Source Identity and Access Management
#27I'm building something with it currently and it's quite nice, especially if you are already familiar with spring security. Documentation is quite sparse tho.
Re: Keycloak: Open-Source Identity and Access Management
#28Re: Keycloak: Open-Source Identity and Access Management
#29Re: Keycloak: Open-Source Identity and Access Management
#30I have a few services on my family server (say, Gitea, Grafana, finance tracking app etc.). I'd like to have a SSO but also limit which users can use which services (e.g. my significant other can use Grafana but no Gitea).
Is integrating above services with Keycloak enough? Or would I need another components? Or maybe I've got it wrong and should reconsider the architecture?