Live data from Hacker News

Considered "18+"

daniel.haxx.se

101–110 of 156 posts

Re: Considered "18+"

#101
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And there's still devs that want the in-office life still..

We've been working home for 2 years. They want us to run all traffic through the VPN that applies the same filtering. Please excuse me if I forget to turn it on.

Here’s some lag in your process because c-level can’t stop downloading ringtones.

Re: Considered "18+"

#102
post #13

A number of my personal sites end up blocked by corporate firewalls. It’s slightly infuriating. Even my own company. I got in a literal fight with IT needing to justify the why in why I needed access to my own website. Like I can live without it, but it’s nothing but my blog where I rant about tech. The why should be why is it blocked to begin with. The default state should not be blocked .

>I got in a literal fight with IT needing to justify the why in why I needed access to my own website. Legitimately asking, why do you need access to your private website on corporate resources during work? Access your private stuff on your BYOD.

I occasionally link to my blog articles when I am trying to make a point. It is often better to reference my well-thought-out and composed arguments rather than typing them out again on-demand with less thought.

Although that is not a very strong justification.

Re: Considered "18+"

#104
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Praying for all the people who use the shortened form of Richard

The ultimate litmus test for such filtering. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Van_Dyke And a favorite tech blog/news website that is often blocked: https://torrentfreak.com/

As a racing fan, Dick Trickle [0] (retired NASCAR driver) is also a fun name.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Trickle

Re: Considered "18+"

#105
post #13

A number of my personal sites end up blocked by corporate firewalls. It’s slightly infuriating. Even my own company. I got in a literal fight with IT needing to justify the why in why I needed access to my own website. Like I can live without it, but it’s nothing but my blog where I rant about tech. The why should be why is it blocked to begin with. The default state should not be blocked .

Any exception to the firewall policy requires supporting documentation. IT may just be covering their own ass/literally doing their job properly when they ask for the justification.

Re: Considered "18+"

#106
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know that Dick is another name for Richard. But Why? They don't seem to even be plays off of the same name, nor do they sound the same at all. It's like if another name for John was Frank. It makes zero sense.

My wife's name is Aleksandra, but the short version of that is Ola. Similarly, Olek is a short for Aleksander. Also no idea why.

> Olek is a short for Aleksander.

Very likely this is due to both being transliterations from Cyrillic.

Re: Considered "18+"

#107
post #8

I'm glad he was able to resolve this. I get the feeling most people wouldn't care, because after all they're not blocking instagram/facebook/tiktok.

Where have you read that? It reads to me that he applied for unblocking, but no result as of yet.

Sorry you're right I misread that. I can't edit the above comment

Re: Considered "18+"

#108
post #13

A number of my personal sites end up blocked by corporate firewalls. It’s slightly infuriating. Even my own company. I got in a literal fight with IT needing to justify the why in why I needed access to my own website. Like I can live without it, but it’s nothing but my blog where I rant about tech. The why should be why is it blocked to begin with. The default state should not be blocked .

Even more ridiculous: several small sites run by my team, from our own public IP space, have been blocked by the corporate firewall. There has never been anything wrong with them, it's just braindead blocking software purchased by incompetent managers.

Regarding braindead blocking software and incompetent managers - all blocking software is braindead and what's worse, opaque (good luck finding out why a site is blocked, the devs don't care). Us incompetent managers often end up purchasing them do tick a check box required by the insurance company and/or the government, neither of which care that it's all snake oil.

Re: Considered "18+"

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this filtering an extra feature like parental controls or corporate filtering? Or was this just blanket filtering applied to all Vodafone customers?

In the UK the filtering is on by default. The customer can opt out of the filtering by contacting the ISP and requesting to opt out. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_blocking_in_the_United_Kin...

My ISP asked my if I wanted filtering when I signed up. Amusingly if you say yes it suggests you find a different ISP.
Post reply on HN