From seawater to drinking water, with the push of a button
1–10 of 103 posts
Re: From seawater to drinking water, with the push of a button
#2Re: From seawater to drinking water, with the push of a button
#3Re: From seawater to drinking water, with the push of a button
#4Amazing! Is this a game changer?
Re: From seawater to drinking water, with the push of a button
#5Re: From seawater to drinking water, with the push of a button
#6However, they’re not trying to be more efficient than RO devices, they’re trying to be more compact, portable, and avoid the need for filters.
They’re solving for a different problem than I was measuring them against.
In my race to criticize, I overlooked those key details.
I still think my comment is worth reading to learn about the efficiency differences but I guess that measurement is not important for the viability of this technology.
Original criticism below: ———————
I’m skeptical about how practical this actually is.
While it’s refreshing to see a drinking water solution that isn’t based on inefficient dehumidifier technology, this still seems impractical.
From the demonstration video, their portable ~50 watt solar panel took 30 minutes to get a few ounces of drinking water.
It looked like a cold winter day, so let’s be generous and assume the panel only produced 15 watts of power during those 30 minutes.
Let’s also be generous and say they got 5 ounces of water.
That means they produce 1 ounce of water for every 3 watts.
That’d be 333 ounces per kWh.
To put that into perspective, a desalination plant produces more than 100x that much.
Yes, there is lots of additional infrastructure to consider with a traditional desalination plant but It’s not like this solution wouldn’t require the same complexity to scale up.
I don’t remember the cost of dehumidifier drinking water “solutions” but I think this is slightly more efficient than those horrifically inefficient solutions.
Re: From seawater to drinking water, with the push of a button
#7The limitations appear to be expensive materials and scale.
20w per liter .3 liters per hour
Re: From seawater to drinking water, with the push of a button
#8Amazing! Is this a game changer?
Maybe. I think Atmospheric Water Generators are much More likely to change the game since they don’t need a body of water other than the atmosphere.
Re: From seawater to drinking water, with the push of a button
#9Amazing! Is this a game changer?
Maybe. I think Atmospheric Water Generators are much More likely to change the game since they don’t need a body of water other than the atmosphere.
At first I thought you were just using a marketing term for dehumidifiers but I looked it up before posting.
I see that term is used for tight mesh fabric that’s hung vertically as a passive matrix to collect condensation.
While those are actually game changers, they unfortunately only work in special regions that have the needed weather and topography to make them work.
I think there’s only one place on earth that has the perfect combination for AWG: weather, drought, and humidity. It’s an awesome technology for them but that’s about the extent of it.
I’ll try to find the region and update my comment with more info.
Edit: here’s a video that talks about what I think you’re talking about.
It’s providing water in the Atacama Desert near Lima Peru.
Edit 2: They’re called fog collectors and apparently Morocco uses them too. https://youtu.be/0F7CQMd6mQ4
Re: From seawater to drinking water, with the push of a button
#10Edit: I wrote out the comment below criticizing the efficiency of this device, when compared to reverse osmosis RO desalination (100x less efficient). However, they’re not trying to be more efficient than RO devices, they’re trying to be more compact, portable, and avoid the need for filters. They’re solving for a different problem than I was measuring them against. In my race to criticize, I overlooked those key det…