Earlier quoted context omitted.
None of those things will solve the real problem: We're destroying our own biosphere. Our kids are going to live in an objectively shittier world, to say nothing of their children. That's not solvable with random acts of kindness, because cruelty isn't what's killing the planet. It's indifference. It's not solvable by voting, because the generation you can vote into political power will never suffer the consequences…
> Our kids are going to live in an objectively shittier world, to say nothing of their children. This is complete horseshit. They will have better medical technology, better housing technology, better food technology (people ate like shit 50 years ago let alone 100 years ago), etc. It’s only “objectively shittier” if your objective has nothing to do with human life and is mainly focused on biodiversity.
Almost everywhere throughout the developed world the ratio "house prices"/"wages" is skyrocketing. Young people are increasingly forming a precariat with fewer and fewer of them being able to own a home and constitute a family. "Better housing technology" what does this even mean? Solar panels on the roof? Well first you need to own a roof to put panels in.
>better food technology
Obesity is increasing. In most places junk food is cheaper per calorie than healthy food (to say nothing of aggressive marketing of the former). Again, what does this "better food technology" refer to?