Live data from Hacker News

Infinite Mac

macos8.app

301–310 of 340 posts

Re: Infinite Mac

#301

You know what's nice? The 13" (rescaled) 4:3 screen is easier to read than my current setup. Also, the menu's are nice and short. Very focus. I totally understand how I, and many people in the past, were able to pump out huge amounts of code in a week

Menus are supposed to have 7 +/- 2 items. Inside Macintosh Volume 1, if memory serves.

Inside Macintosh. What a great set of volumes. I'd forgotten about them.

Re: Infinite Mac

#302
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Vectors will scale to any pixel density, but they look irritatingly fuzzy at the lower pixel densities you commonly see in large widescreen monitors. Obviously it's not an apples-to-apples comparison, but decades ago bitmapped fonts could give you crisp text on any monitor, and in 2022 I'm using a popular, >$1300, very favorably reviewed monitor, and the text is ever-so-slightly fuzzy. It's plugged into my Macbook Pr…

The problem is you have it plugged into a macbook. Apple doesn't support subpixel anti-aliasing in any of its latest releases. Your monitor looks so fuzzy because Apple has removed the capability to make it not look so fuzzy.

[deleted]

Re: Infinite Mac

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there a way to use appletalk on a LAN? I would love to get a game of multiplayer bolo going in my office.

There is! netatalk on linux is the package you need for that, and it's still built in to BSD, I believe. now weather that package still speaks the older versions of the protocol, who can say. Interestingly, a challenge you would have with this because this emulator is web based, your networking options would be fairly limited, even if you could emulate netatalk, the browser's security features would preclude you acce…

netatalk provides macintosh fileshare hosting services on unix/linux. It has nothing to do with this use case.

Re: Infinite Mac

#304
post #99

Creator of the site here. There's a blog post with the technical details if you're curious about how it works and whose work it builds on: https://blog.persistent.info/2022/03/blog-post.html There are also a couple of variants that boot either System 7.5.3 or KanjiTalk 7.5.3 (the Japanese version of MacOS): https://system7.app/ and https://kanjitalk7.app/

Is there a way to use appletalk on a LAN? I would love to get a game of multiplayer bolo going in my office.

Since you can't listen for incoming connections from a browser, most likely no.

Coincidentally, Bolo networking was originally designed for serial networks like LocalTalk. The same network logic was used when UDP support was added. So there are assumptions made about learning of another player's network address from an third player, and is the reason why ubiquitous NAT broke Bolo internet gaming.

But if you have an old Mac around, you can play internet Bolo games using a Bolo packet re-writing proxy I wrote. We schedule games occasionally over at 68kMLA.

Re: Infinite Mac

#305
post #99

Creator of the site here. There's a blog post with the technical details if you're curious about how it works and whose work it builds on: https://blog.persistent.info/2022/03/blog-post.html There are also a couple of variants that boot either System 7.5.3 or KanjiTalk 7.5.3 (the Japanese version of MacOS): https://system7.app/ and https://kanjitalk7.app/

Very impressive. A fantastic next step would be to emulate a NeXT so you can run WorldWideWeb, Tim Berners-Lee's original browser+editor. A bit like https://worldwideweb.cern.ch/ but including the whole NeXTSTEP system around it, allowing for looking at source code, editing pages, etc.

What a great tool that would be for educating how the original Web was built.

Re: Infinite Mac

#306
post #131
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> now everything is fuzzy, antialiased, scalable, flat, hard to make out. Use a high-DPI screen, for starters.

It's pretty poor to regress on the vast majority of currently available displays just because there are a handful of multi-thousand-dollar monitors available. Apple can't even sell a 27" monitor for less than $1500 because the experience wouldn't be on-brand. If you look at the big-ticket items that Apple sells, they have cheaper versions of everything except displays. They only put their brand on the most expensive…

MacOS looks great on my 250€ LG 24UD58 (24" 4K). Unfortunately they stopped making it and all 4K screens made now are 27" and up which is too big for 200% scaling :(

Re: Infinite Mac

#308
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Vectors will scale to any pixel density, but they look irritatingly fuzzy at the lower pixel densities you commonly see in large widescreen monitors. Obviously it's not an apples-to-apples comparison, but decades ago bitmapped fonts could give you crisp text on any monitor, and in 2022 I'm using a popular, >$1300, very favorably reviewed monitor, and the text is ever-so-slightly fuzzy. It's plugged into my Macbook Pr…

The problem is you have it plugged into a macbook. Apple doesn't support subpixel anti-aliasing in any of its latest releases. Your monitor looks so fuzzy because Apple has removed the capability to make it not look so fuzzy.

Oh interesting, I was wondering why my HP (Ubuntu) laptop looked sharper than my Macbook on a QHD monitor.
Post reply on HN