Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources

What's funny is that the people who are threatening to leave for other platforms don't understand what an enormous amount of engineering effort it is to build AI at scale to control wrongthink. They think it's something that the platform owner turns up and down like a thermostat.

I'm also utterly gobsmacked how people here think "jump to the defense of billionaires" is in any way a substantive counter-argument.

One example of Twitter's obvious role in election meddling is this: before 2020 elections, posting new york post's article on Hunter Biden's laptop leaks would result in an error. At the time all the msm said this was fake news. The New York Times, more than a year later accepted that the laptop indeed belonged to Hunter Biden. Twitter is heavily biased towards promoting progressive 'ideals' and hollywood propaganda. It's trending section, even after muting and blocking several accounts and words, keeps suggesting biased 'news'. It also played a huge role in the Arab Springs which arguably is the largest criminal act in 12 years. I'm glad censorship is being taken seriously. Hope Musk is a true libertarian when it comes to free speech.

And what is the chance that Twitter's refusal to ban someone in future will cause Musk to get "cancelled"?

I don't think you have seen the power of cancel culture. Once, X number of celebrities decide that Y needs to be cancelled, the pressure is enormous on all businesses and their CEOs to join the cancel parade. It's literally you are with us or against us. In fact, these cancel culture torch bearers will now use Twitter itself to put pressure on subscribers and advertizers.

Just imagine Trump coming back, posting something very controversial and all celebreties up in arm against Musk to ban him again. At that moment, it is no-win scenario (I call it getting "Zucked"). If you ban him, republicans paints target on you. If you don't then dems do that job. Musk has companies that require belovancy from government and it is not really hard to put him at enormous disadvantage.

After 16 years I still struggle to concede the value proposition of Twitter. I don't think it's the best platform for advancing democracy, and I'm convinced we should aim higher.

Take a cue from StackOverflow, which does a better job surfacing quality content while letting drivel sift to the bottom. It has an incentive system where those who demonstrate expertise build up reputation over time (instead of a simple popularity contest won by the loudest voices). Even here on HN the culture nurtures a forum that holds more interest for me than Twitter.

I know politics is a different game, but I think the internet's still barely scratched the surface when it comes to transforming democracy. There's so much runway remaining to elevate constituent engagement without the toxicity. When I see examples like municipalities using apps to let citizens photograph and report potholes it gives me hope. The internet is powerful at enabling people who care about a given set of issues to congregate in convenience and without limits of geography. We can figure out how to do it more constructively.

I envision a more issues-centric platform, a kind of one-stop you can visit to get a concise picture of the best-informed discussion around hot topics of the day (or archives of the past). With elements from Wikipedia, and the ability (and allure) to dive deeper where you're interested. Integrate fact-checking efforts (something like Snopes / PolitiFact) to encourage authenticity. Maybe you could even plug in a feedback loop where local officials can open polls and allow granular voting on matters within their jurisdiction (borrow ideas from Change.org) or facilitate grassroots organization ("garbage cleanup at the park today swing down if you can").

Democracy could never exist without the invention of mass media. Historically that's been a one-way street. The internet upgraded the pipe to an instant, two-way connection to almost every citizen. Yet we've stuck to the same old pattern (figures with lots of followers using it to broadcast their message) with a bit of incremental evolution (interesting or provocative replies can get upvoted). But that's just baby steps. The internet has transformed nearly every other industry, is even transforming banking and finance, and I believe the way we run our civil institutions is up next.

Just like invention of mass-media enabled democracy, the internet is about to facilitate the evolution of some kind of Democracy 2.0. I for one want to see that nurtured into something amazing and special.