Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Project Gutenberg – Library of over 60k free eBooks

gutenberg.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

71–80 of 81 posts

Re: Project Gutenberg – Library of over 60k free eBooks

#71

Post by kaba0 »

WalterBright wrote: post #68
kaba0 wrote: post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you even get my point that communism is different from socialism? I very much stated exactly that communism (in my opinion can’t work either). But socialism as a spectrum of ideas has plenty of working aspects included in basically every Western democracy.

Socialism produces mediocre works, and can't compete with free market operations. This is why socialist operations tend to be heavily subsidized or they simply make free market competitors illegal. It's most obvious when agriculture is socialized, because it's impossible for people to believe the lie that they aren't starving. Yes, I know that communism is supposed to be without a government.

Free market is not inherently incompatible with socialism. Hell, free market only works properly (according to its very creator, Adam Smith) when it is confined to a well-regulated market.

The only entity capable of creating such a market is the government itself. Also, don’t forget that plenty of areas simply don’t operate on a supply-demand basis — e.g. healthcare.

Re: Project Gutenberg – Library of over 60k free eBooks

#73

Post by revolvingocelot »

WalterBright wrote: post #61
revolvingocelot wrote: post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a repulsive argumentative style. >>>I also expect that making money is a prime motivator for artists, and also drives the quality of their work. is a much less hostile claim than >I happen to know some successful artists (you'd recognize their names), and they are very much in it for the big bucks. which could have been made in the initial comment, but then parent wouldn't be able to Other the grandparent for th…

I didn't argue that people cannot work together at scale. My argument, admittedly heavyhanded, is that organizing this work based on altruism does not work. It may work here and there, for a period of time, but it is not sustainable. Organizations that work are ones where people are paid for the work they do, not ones that pay people regardless of the work they do. By the way, anti-ethical does not mean unethical. It…

Sikhs [0] are humans, and presumably have the same human nature everyone in this thread shares. If the parent contends that what the Sikhs [0] do is a "commune", then the facticity of their continued success shows that "communes" do not always fail. If what the Sikhs do is not a "commune", then the parent has set up and defeated a strawman unrelated to the example set by Sikhs [0]. Which is it?

As the facticity of Sikh [0] food distribution is not at issue[1], it's obvious that organizing this work based on altruism actually does work, and altruism at this scale is possible. The parent's emotional opposition to the concept has led them to make, and now defend, unrelated claims -- and ignore the reality on the ground.

No one, beyond the parent themselves, brought up communes, forcible or otherwise. Even if this were relevant, the Sikhs [0] do not force anyone to participate in or accept their voluntary food distribution, so I'm at a total loss as to why any of this was brought up at all -- unless the parent is actually trying to advance an ideological position, which seems to be that cooperation doesn't work at scale [1]. Oops, I mean a slightly larger scale [2]. Perhaps that's true in whatever culture the parent grew up in, but as Sikhs [0] prove, it's obviously not a human universal. Perhaps the parent doesn't consider Sikhs human?

What a repulsive argumentative style.

[0] via langars

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31150154 entirety of their home country, this demonstrates that their approach cannot be scaled up any further

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31151819 <- history shows that most countries that attempt to feed all their citizens are naturally regime change'd by the CIA, so this one checks out

Re: Project Gutenberg – Library of over 60k free eBooks

#74

Post by WalterBright »

revolvingocelot wrote: post #73
WalterBright wrote: post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn't argue that people cannot work together at scale. My argument, admittedly heavyhanded, is that organizing this work based on altruism does not work. It may work here and there, for a period of time, but it is not sustainable. Organizations that work are ones where people are paid for the work they do, not ones that pay people regardless of the work they do. By the way, anti-ethical does not mean unethical. It…

Sikhs [0] are humans, and presumably have the same human nature everyone in this thread shares. If the parent contends that what the Sikhs [0] do is a "commune", then the facticity of their continued success shows that "communes" do not always fail. If what the Sikhs do is not a "commune", then the parent has set up and defeated a strawman unrelated to the example set by Sikhs [0]. Which is it? As the facticity of Si…

> entirety

I never said entirety. If you want to disagree with me, fine, but please don't add extra words that change the meaning.

The Langar was proposed as a model for society. Shall we visit the numbers? 50,000 meals served per day, 1,380,000,000 people. 4,140,000,000 meals needed per day if it was a societal model. I estimate 2,000 volunteers are needed to do the 50,000 meals.

Langar has been around for 400 years. Out of 1,380,000,000 they can only muster 2,000 volunteers. Does that sound workable as a model for society? It doesn't to me.

The Langar relies on donations, too. I.e. whether it is a commune or not, it is not able to support itself.

As for some American examples, there's Woodstock, which subsisted on donated food, medical attention, etc. That lasted for three days, then the people left the field completely carpeted in trash, left it for others to clean up.

There was the summer of love in San Francisco, in 1969, which operated on give what you can, take what you need. It collapsed after 3 months, as too many people took and too few gave.

> Perhaps the parent doesn't consider Sikhs human? What a repulsive argumentative style.

That's your strawman.

Re: Project Gutenberg – Library of over 60k free eBooks

#75

Post by WalterBright »

kaba0 wrote: post #71
WalterBright wrote: post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Socialism produces mediocre works, and can't compete with free market operations. This is why socialist operations tend to be heavily subsidized or they simply make free market competitors illegal. It's most obvious when agriculture is socialized, because it's impossible for people to believe the lie that they aren't starving. Yes, I know that communism is supposed to be without a government.

Free market is not inherently incompatible with socialism. Hell, free market only works properly (according to its very creator, Adam Smith) when it is confined to a well-regulated market. The only entity capable of creating such a market is the government itself. Also, don’t forget that plenty of areas simply don’t operate on a supply-demand basis — e.g. healthcare.

Socialism isn't defined in terms of a "well-regulated market". Socialism is when the government provides goods and services.

> don’t forget that plenty of areas simply don’t operate on a supply-demand basis — e.g. healthcare

Supply-demand is in play even under socialism.

But here's a simple example. Take your corner drugstore. It has a couple aisles of all sorts of healthcare products, from aspirin to toothbrushes to athlete's foot cream to cold remedies. There are multiple brands with multiple formulations at various price points. How does supply & demand not apply there?

More generally, pick any health care issue. For each, there are a multiple of options available, with varying costs, efficacies, risks, and pain. Including doing nothing (by far most diseases disappear on their own). How is that not supply & demand?

Re: Project Gutenberg – Library of over 60k free eBooks

#77

Post by revolvingocelot »

WalterBright wrote: post #74
revolvingocelot wrote: post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sikhs [0] are humans, and presumably have the same human nature everyone in this thread shares. If the parent contends that what the Sikhs [0] do is a "commune", then the facticity of their continued success shows that "communes" do not always fail. If what the Sikhs do is not a "commune", then the parent has set up and defeated a strawman unrelated to the example set by Sikhs [0]. Which is it? As the facticity of Si…

> entirety I never said entirety. If you want to disagree with me, fine, but please don't add extra words that change the meaning. The Langar was proposed as a model for society. Shall we visit the numbers? 50,000 meals served per day, 1,380,000,000 people. 4,140,000,000 meals needed per day if it was a societal model. I estimate 2,000 volunteers are needed to do the 50,000 meals. Langar has been around for 400 years…

>The Langar was proposed as a model for society

The Langar was proposed as an example of a societal feature that could be amplified by automation. The parent is putting words into 'TaylorAlexander's mouth, but we all can just fucking read his comment. [0] The temerity of the parent, in blithely accusing me of "add[ing] extra words that change the meaning", given how they butcher the claim that started this fucking subthread, is absolutely repulsive. I can dismiss the rest of the parent's argumentation with the ease with which they dismissed mine, namely

>Sikhs [0] are humans, and presumably have the same human nature everyone in this thread shares. If the parent contends that what the Sikhs [0] do is a "commune", then the facticity of their continued success shows that "communes" do not always fail. If what the Sikhs do is not a "commune", then the parent has set up and defeated a strawman unrelated to the example set by Sikhs [0]. Which is it?

The refusal to actually address anything (is the langar a commune? Does whatever it is work, or not? Are Sikhs governed by human nature or not?) is breezily elided, in favour of 'Merican counterexamples. Who cares that the langar is a small-scale example of what the parent literally claimed was impossible and beyond the human spirit, and why should the parent address anything anyone actually says?

It's bananas that 'TaylorAlexander began by citing the tradition of the langars to facilitate the idea that this sort of arrangement was possible -- which was gainsaid by the parent -- and I am now reading what appears to be the grudging acceptance of the reality of that possibility now used to suggest that no greater implementation is possible. It's one thing to Just Want To Be Right, but quite another to dress it up in rationalization and shenanigans on display here.

>> Perhaps the parent doesn't consider Sikhs human? What a repulsive argumentative style.

>That's your strawman.

I note that the parent still doesn't bother to elaborate here. There's no acknowledgement that the parent made ridiculous counterfactual claims ignoring the actual realities of langyar generosity, or whether they were communes, or whether they were operated by humans, and is now wholehearted accepting it in the name of Being Right -- there's just the satisfaction of a good reversal. Well, enjoy the goalposts, wherever you may find them; I no longer wish to play Calvinball. You "win"; a better world is not possible, certainly not while having this sort of "discussion".

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31146511

Re: Project Gutenberg – Library of over 60k free eBooks

#78

Post by cxr »

derstander wrote: post #16
marcodiego wrote: post #12

I imagine a machine. Something similar to that automated coca-cola machines which you choose the flavor of your soda, pay it and it spits it. Imagine a machine where you could choose a book from project Gutenberg, pay it and have it instantly printed for you.

The Harvard Book Store (the independent one, not the Coop) has just such a machine! Though I haven’t used it. https://www.harvard.com/clubs_services/books_on_demand/

That service was shut down within just 24 hours of your leaving this comment:

> Termination of Print-on-Demand Services

> Print-on-Demand services are no longer available through Harvard Book Store, effective Monday, April 25, 2022.

Re: Project Gutenberg – Library of over 60k free eBooks

#79

Post by WalterBright »

revolvingocelot wrote: post #77
WalterBright wrote: post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> entirety I never said entirety. If you want to disagree with me, fine, but please don't add extra words that change the meaning. The Langar was proposed as a model for society. Shall we visit the numbers? 50,000 meals served per day, 1,380,000,000 people. 4,140,000,000 meals needed per day if it was a societal model. I estimate 2,000 volunteers are needed to do the 50,000 meals. Langar has been around for 400 years…

>The Langar was proposed as a model for society The Langar was proposed as an example of a societal feature that could be amplified by automation. The parent is putting words into 'TaylorAlexander's mouth, but we all can just fucking read his comment. [0] The temerity of the parent, in blithely accusing me of "add[ing] extra words that change the meaning", given how they butcher the claim that started this fucking su…

> I note that the parent still doesn't bother to elaborate here.

Right, because your strawman is your problem.

Re: Project Gutenberg – Library of over 60k free eBooks

#80

Post by fmmlp »

WalterBright wrote: post #64
TaylorAlexander wrote: post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Sikhs have been doing their thing for 400 years.

I presume you mean the Langar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langar_(Sikhism) As I noted in another post here, while an admirable endeavor, it has not managed to serve free meals to a significant percentage of India's population. There are apparently limits to selfless volunteerism.

I don't think they purpose is feeding the whole India population.
Post reply on HN