If Musk acquires Twitter, I will likely be deleting my account. Am I the only one? Would his acquisition spell the beginning of the end for Twitter?
Why? What I’m earth changes the next day? I’d you enjoy Twitter, use it. If it stops bringing you joy, stop using it. I, on the other hand, already dislike Twitter and may very well give it another chance under new leadership. But it’s just a social media account, everything doesn’t need to be some kind of statement. If you want to delete it, just do it, we don’t all need to hear about it.
Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal
191–200 of 348 posts
Re: Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal
#192I guess HN was wrong (top comments) that Musk couldn't possibly have a way to finance his deal. And here we are.
Re: Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
He's not an inept businessman. He's someone with aspergers who takes someone at face value at all times. If someone says something is the case he believes them. He doesn't handle being deceived well nor does he know when it's happening. And actually he's not a "businessman" at all. He's an engineer at heart. "Businessman" would require strong social skills, not something someone with aspergers has good ability at.
>He's an engineer at heart. He has not built anything.
Also, his official title at SpaceX is "Chief Engineer" [0]
Re: Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really hard to imagine the richest and most accomplished dude on the planet not being able to secure funding. Somehow people still think he’s just a showman. At some point in time, accomplishments can’t be explained away
Yes, Tesla is very good at securing funding: https://realmoney.thestreet.com/investing/stocks/tesla-s-mai... "Congratulations, Mr. and Mrs. Heartland America, you have just subsidized a bunch of millionaires living in California's most expensive coastal ZIP codes to the tune of $10,197 per car. I'm sure they are sending you a thank-you card." It would be hilarious if it turns out that the government is interested in…
Mr and Mrs Heartland America should be more concerned about the subsidies for oil companies; what are those meant to accomplish exactly?
Re: Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Really hard to imagine the richest and most accomplished dude on the planet not being able to secure funding. You don’t have to imagine. It literally already happened once when he claimed he had funding secured to take Tesla private. As such, if you can’t imagine him not having funding secured this time, you’re severely lacking in imagination.
In his latest TED interview [0], Musk said that he had the funding secured for that Tesla private offering. He said that he needed to settle with the SEC so that they wouldn't freeze Tesla's bank accounts, and as part of the settlement he needed to publicly say that he hadn't secured funding. I don't think he's lying. 0: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdZZpaB2kDM
Re: Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
> He's got money and hired some smart people. Definitely not a fan of his but hiring smart people and enabling them is an accomplishment. As wealthy as he is, he didn’t inherit all of what he has today. He’s definitely done more than many people who come from wealth.
He didn't inherit any of what he has today, did he? And he didn't come from wealth. He grew up in South Africa.
Re: Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, like subways? Or every single road and train tunnel anywhere on the planet so far? Moving transportation underground is such revolutionary idea that it exists for a century by now.
>Moving transportation underground is such revolutionary idea that it exists for a century by now. You ignored the essential part of his well written and detailed explanation - its not about the fact that its underground, but the cost of creating underground pathways, for cars or whatever. It saddens me that bad posts like yours infect HN.
Re: Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which new markets, after paypal? Cars? Rockets that go into space? Solar on roofs? Things carrying people through tunnels? And in all the successful cases he had massive contributions by others. He provided the money, which is huge in itself. The actual work eas done by others, and the fact the Musk fails to properly say so, and that his fanboys believe every single of his claims, truely makes him the Steve Jobs of 2…
> The actual work eas done by others, Boeing probably has more and better engineers than SpaceX. Same with Toyota/Volkswagen compared to Tesla. Yet these companies simply cannot innovate. Talent (ability to do good work) is pointless without good leadership. > the fact the Musk fails to properly say so This is a lie. https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/15170727534756003... > The failures are mine, the successe…
It is a different kind of innovation so, only considering "disruptuon" as innovation is quite short sighted so. Espiecially since Christensen himself differentiates between disruptive and sustaining (?) innovation.
Re: Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
Free speech, A truer town square to debate important issues, Remove bots, add new features, a fresh take on how to raise profits, better management, and he even mentioned building a homeless shelter in their HQ.
What’s free speech? Twitter can be a pretty hostile place if you’re not a white straight man, can’t see Musk making it any betters for those people who are currently harrassed fir being women, queer or colored
Re: Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems a little dramatic to delete your account, don't you think?
It really depends on if he follows through on what he is proposing, which seems to be to allow for disinformation and hate speech. If that turns out to not be the case, then I might reconsider.
If you have to put a real, verified name behind these posts, at least that can cut into the massive bot armies spreading disinformation and the massive foreign spending that goes into amplifying all of it.
Then you would have the benefits of a free speech platform while preventing it from becoming a psunami of noise.
You have to stand behind what you say, because your real name is on it. True, we do have politicians and others trying to spin destructive narratives and spread falsehoods, but it is their right in the United States to do so, as long as it does not run awfoul of existing laws.