10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
21–30 of 227 posts
Re: 10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
#22While this fosters new ideas and opportunities, that conversion into long-term direction and execution can be pretty rough.
Re: 10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
#23It feels like Google’s attention span, leadership longevity, and product development patience is roughly 3 years. Any product that survives longer than that probably has transcended beyond being a “pet project/toy” into a PR-problem or revenue-stream significant enough that it takes on a life of it’s own. As management turns over, that lease on life is renewed… https://killedbygoogle.com/ While this fosters new ideas…
Re: 10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
#24Re: 10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
#25Re: 10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
#26Worth noting that it's not actually "Google" that said to "hang tight". An entire brand does not make a decision like whether to support Linux. It's a two-pizza team with a shitty budget and a remit to just keep the damn thing from going down and working out all the bugs with basic features like moving a file to a new folder in a weird drop-down. I'm sure the team would like to support Linux, if they had a bigger bud…
You're right about the motivations: they must not view it as creating real business value, since that's how these decisions get made.
My only point here is that it IS a choice someone in an office is making: it's not worth it to support Drive on Linux. They do know about it, because it was on their radar 10 years ago. Somebody took it off their radar.
Re: 10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
#27Re: 10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
#28There’s a pretty good FUSE driver and the web app is fine. Never felt the need for a Linux client for this service. Two decades of Linux use and the thing that has changed everything has been the arrival of electron which has made practically everything cross-platform.
Ripcord doesn't have the best UI and I can't open Teams calls or even links that are too long (Slack broke their API at some point) but at least it's not wasting my ram and it's responds quickly. The rare times I have to open Slack on the web I sigh and wait 2 minutes for the app to load.
I automated Prituln VPN via bash just not to have to deal with another Electron client for a damn popup on my tray bar.
Re: 10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
#29Re: 10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
#30I connected my Linux systems to my Nextcloud server, and then I connected my Gdrive as external storage in Nextcloud. When I turned on server side encryption in Nextcloud it also encrypted my connected storage of Gdrive. So I accomplished both Gdrive integration as well as file encryption at the same time.
This bit sounds interesting, could you explain it a little more, how you managed it?