Live data from Hacker News

Google Labs no more

labs.google.com

31–40 of 82 posts

Re: Google Labs no more

#31

Does anything remotely like Bell Labs exist today? Is it simply not possible with everyone tightening their belts? If you're unfamiliar with what came out of Bell Labs, check out this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_labs#Discoveries_and_devel... Or is it the fate of software innovation that it is to be decentralized and happen in our spare time now?

Xerox PARC, IBM Research, MS Research, Google Research (don't confuse Google Labs with research). There are plenty more.

Re: Google Labs no more

#32
It does align nicely with Steve Yegge's post: strive to be a platform. Let people build what they need. Don't try to be everything to everybody. Less products, more services. Maybe right, maybe wrong, but Google shows that they CAN DECIDE and I applaude them for that.

Re: Google Labs no more

#33
Do they really need Labs now? Google has grown to a size where they can easily acquire promising young start-ups out in the wild.

One advantage of having Labs back in the day was that projects could have the backing of Google's infrastructure. Now, with cloud services like AWS, the bar is set low enough that anyone has access to this kind of stuff. How hard is it to start a YouTube in this day and age?

Re: Google Labs no more

#34
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple did have "labs." One of the first thing Steve Jobs did when he returned was shut it down. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Technology_Group

That explanation misses a lot of context. It comes across as a criticism, as if Jobs just didn't see the benefit of research. That's not the case. He wanted to shrink the things they focused on, so they could put their 'A' team on every project (which required less projects). The end result was having a bunch of really talented guys focusing on things that drove business value.

I didn't intend it to be a criticism, just a factual remark. Then again, I shouldn't have really compared the two. Google labs wasn't really a dedicated research wing at Google, more like cool stuff people from various teams worked on in their spare time.

Re: Google Labs no more

#35
post #6

I get the feeling that the bean counters are taking over Google and slashing off everything that doesn't have obvious monetization potential. I mean, I know great people who work there, but overall it seems like they're turning into Microsoft circa 2000 - they own the industry, they buy startups and kill the products made by about half of them. Some of their products are great, but a lot of it is just an obvious mono…

You would never seen something like "Labs" from Apple, and everyone applauds them for "focus".

Hardware requires focus. Software requires experimentation.

Re: Google Labs no more

#37
post #11

I honestly never used it, and am completely unaffected by this. What was the most successful product that emerged out of google labs?

Not sure if this includes other services like Gmail Labs, but I relied on "attachment reminder" throughout college. It has saved me multiple times, including now in my professional career.

I may be wrong, but I think it's been rolled into the main product. A few times, recently, I've been prompted as to whether I've forgotten an attachment, and I don't recall ever turning that Labs feature on.

Re: Google Labs no more

#38
post #11

I honestly never used it, and am completely unaffected by this. What was the most successful product that emerged out of google labs?

Not sure if this includes other services like Gmail Labs, but I relied on "attachment reminder" throughout college. It has saved me multiple times, including now in my professional career.

No, Gmail Labs is separate and is not being shut down.

Re: Google Labs no more

#40

Does anything remotely like Bell Labs exist today? Is it simply not possible with everyone tightening their belts? If you're unfamiliar with what came out of Bell Labs, check out this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_labs#Discoveries_and_devel... Or is it the fate of software innovation that it is to be decentralized and happen in our spare time now?

Xerox PARC, IBM Research, MS Research, Google Research (don't confuse Google Labs with research). There are plenty more.

Isn't PARC pretty much a consultancy now?
Post reply on HN