Live data from Hacker News

Rumor: Google spending $150M to launch 25+ professional YouTube channels

deadline.com

1–10 of 32 posts

Re: Rumor: Google spending $150M to launch 25+ professional YouTube channels

#2
This is a REAL potential game changer and I've been patiently waiting to see how long it would take before a major internet video streaming company made this move.

The underlying reason for Netflix's current woes is because CONTENT producers are squeezing it to them and will be increasing their prices significantly in the next year. The reason Hulu wasn't acquired even though many companies considered it, was because the CONTENT producers (who also happen to currently own Hulu) planned on increasing their prices to anyone who was dumb enough to buy Hulu without long term costs locked in contractually.

With this move, Google is moving to consolidate distribution as well as content production into Youtube. The significance of this can't be underestimated. If YouTube can produce a hit show, there's no middle man to step in and charge them arbitrary licensing fees to host the show.

I don't see any reason why youtube couldn't produce a show like MythBusters or the Jersey Shore. And in a few years, maybe even a show like Breaking Bad.

Once this ball get's rolling traditional cable will be in for a rough ride.

Re: Rumor: Google spending $150M to launch 25+ professional YouTube channels

#3
From the comment section:

"Welcome to the end of middle class jobs in the entertainment industry. These shows will be non-union with corporations using shell corporations to produce them for Google. Everyone (directors, writers, actors, and crew) will be paid pennies on the dollar.

People who think the Entertainment Industry is full of fat cats don’t realize that show business is just like the rest the US economy right now. One percent earns a huge share of the profit, while the rest fight for crumbs, and this is another strong move in that direction. This isn’t a screed to support unions, it’s a screed about the reality of the loss of America’s middle class. It’s been going on for thirty years and it gets worse every day."

Are good directors/writers/actors/etc that easy to find that you can pay them "pennies on the dollar" and still produce a high quality product?

Re: Rumor: Google spending $150M to launch 25+ professional YouTube channels

#4
post #2

This is a REAL potential game changer and I've been patiently waiting to see how long it would take before a major internet video streaming company made this move. The underlying reason for Netflix's current woes is because CONTENT producers are squeezing it to them and will be increasing their prices significantly in the next year. The reason Hulu wasn't acquired even though many companies considered it, was because…

It's up to traditional cable companies to embrace this disruptive technology we like to call "the internet" and find a way to build a better business model using it. This would inevitably undercut their own "traditional" models for content delivery, but as more and more people cut the chord because more options are available, their refusal to innovate simply means that other players are going to come in and take the share they could/should have had.

Re: Rumor: Google spending $150M to launch 25+ professional YouTube channels

#5
The very best of youtube for me as a wannabe, spareroom, hacker is the independent channels. You just can not beat them. For instance, the Geekgroup (great channel) which as far as I can make out is very well funded just doesn't hold a candle to the likes of Photonicinduction, bkraz333, Afrotechmods, jeriellsworth, UnknownLobster, et al when it comes to raw talent.

If I was the head of this google project I'd get in bed with the raw talent.

Re: Rumor: Google spending $150M to launch 25+ professional YouTube channels

#6
One of the differences between tv and Internet is that tv channels have an oligopoly on your attention. There's a small limited number of channels competing for attention across all tv viewers. YouTube has to compete not only against millions of Other things on the net bit also millions of other videos on YouTube itself. It'll be interesting to see if the tv model of taking large million dollar bets on unproven shows works here.

Re: Rumor: Google spending $150M to launch 25+ professional YouTube channels

#9
post #7

Google producing creative content? What could possibly go wrong? It will be entertaining to see how they A/B test the color of the clothing the actors wear for maximum effectiveness.

You joke, but I watched "How Did They Ever Make a Movie of Facebook?" (a making-of doc about The Social Network) and it blew my mind a little bit seeing the process of test-shooting the wardrobes and makeup.

Ah, here's a clip online: http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi1594268185/ ...skip to 6:45

There's a quick cut in there where there's a table with what looks like a hundred pairs of watches.

Re: Rumor: Google spending $150M to launch 25+ professional YouTube channels

#10
post #2

This is a REAL potential game changer and I've been patiently waiting to see how long it would take before a major internet video streaming company made this move. The underlying reason for Netflix's current woes is because CONTENT producers are squeezing it to them and will be increasing their prices significantly in the next year. The reason Hulu wasn't acquired even though many companies considered it, was because…

Indeed! Especially now since there aren't any practical limits on youtube video size, duration, or quality.

There is already a lot of pretty high quality original content on youtube. Some of that content is more popular than some cable content. There are youtube channels which have weekly updates and see millions of viewers on every episode. They are under the traditional media radar though since they don't have a promotional budget and they don't appear in a program lineup anywhere.

This trend can only accelerate from here. Producing a "show" or a "movie" requires a teeny, tiny amount of effort and resources these days, and can be done without spending more than 4 figures on equipment and whatnot.

We are nearing an inflection point in this process, soon there will be a critical mass of shows and viewers such that word-of-mouth recommendations start exploding viewership and more importantly that it begins to become cemented in the zeitgeist that making an "internet tv show" is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, regardless of how talented you are, and more so is a quite feasible thing to do. That will lead to a spiraling increase in both content and viewership which will likely catch a lot of the traditional media folks off guard. I don't think they realize that there is a bubbling cauldron out there which is poised to spew forth the equivalent of hundreds of channels of content. Content that people will watch. And talk about. And value at the same level as traditional TV content.

Post reply on HN