Live data from Hacker News

Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

journals.plos.org

411–420 of 666 posts

Re: Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

#411
post #264

In my area, 40+ developers basically fall into two groups: - Burnt out developers who still like their job. These people often have a background in some STEM field, may hold a PhD etc. They can be difficult to work with due to the odd outburst, but their approach to problem solving is pretty constructive. - Burnt out developers who hate their job. This is the most difficult group of people to work with I've encounter…

How would you characterize 15-25 year old developers?

Re: Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

#412

It's interesting to me people make all sort of assertions about why men or women are dominant in an industry without anyway to falsify their hypothesis. I provide some data points having lived in several countries that may offer some insight. Draw your own conclusions. I got my undergrad degree in Iran (a relatively conservative society with an ultra-conservative even anti-women government), where the ratio of women…

It's because in poor and conservative countries women must choose a high paying job if they want to escape oppression and arranged marriage. However, the more egalitarian and wealthy a country is, the more women are free to choose which job they like most and they are not so interested in Engineering it seems. EDIT: Ha, looks like this is just a Jordan Peterson false claim. Women seem to be strongly represented in sc…

or that society is pushing women against science in all countries but in developing countries this is countered by the need to get a high paying job. in wealthy countries you can live comfortably with a regular job so women are just expected to do that. no one is encouraging little girls to choose science; there is no need

Re: Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

#413
post #264

In my area, 40+ developers basically fall into two groups: - Burnt out developers who still like their job. These people often have a background in some STEM field, may hold a PhD etc. They can be difficult to work with due to the odd outburst, but their approach to problem solving is pretty constructive. - Burnt out developers who hate their job. This is the most difficult group of people to work with I've encounter…

why do you assume burnout by default?

Re: Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

#414
post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It didn’t take long after Silicon Valley was no longer on the air for the entire industry to become more absurd than its parody. I really don’t think any of this is sustainable either. Latinos in particular seem very opposed to this stuff & given that they are part of the fastest growing demographic in the country I don’t see how political support for policies like this can be maintained.

These politics only appeal to ~10% of the population anyway, and they aren't favored by a majority of any ethnicity. This stuff isn't mainstream because voters like it (which is why it never makes its way into any real laws), it's mainstream because the cultural and media elites like it and they don't have to trifle with a democratic process to impose it. Corporate DEI stuff is also useful to "prove" that an employer…

My understanding is that Corporate DEI is mostly bottom up, not top down.

Re: Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

#415
46% of the Swedish legislature are female. About the same in Finland and Norway. That's an indication of not only numbers being roughly balanced, but power and influence as well.

About 25% of the US Senate and House of Representatives are women. That looks bad. But it is about the same in technical roles in US companies. The percentage of women in leadership roles in tech companies is much lower.

Work remains to be done.

Re: Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

#416
post #184

There are very concerning patterns developing at the moment in the DEI space. DEI efforts, and often those leading them, are increasingly the most biased and close minded parts of the organization. Spreading selected stereotypes and often solving concerns about “discrimination” by being very biased and inequitable. For example at my last company a report showed that slightly fewer of a certain minority were promoted.…

I think DEI efforts can greatly vary. I know that we've worked really hard to ensure that we don't disadvantage anyone -- but it's harder than it sounds. DEI is often dealing in zero sum spaces. For example, most of the staff is white males. We try hard to hire the best person for the role, but we've instituted a policy where we mandate interviewing underrepresented groups. Not that we will hire them, but that we wil…

> most of the staff is white males

I'm a computer programmer. Since about the late 90's, virtually all of my coworkers have been Indians. Yet I keep hearing from the DEI group that white males are overrepresented (and that this is bad). I never hear from the DEI group that Indians (or asians) are overrepresented (and whether this is also good or bad).

Re: Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

#417
post #340
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would be interesting to compare this across areas. My impression is that eg Finance (another popular destination for mid-career switches) is far more open in that regard. Experience, even if it's in a different field (as long as it's a technical role or one that will give you a rich set of contacts) seems to generally confer seniority. Would be interesting if someone could weigh in.

Anecdotally, the hard engineering fields (e.g., mechanical, civil, etc.) are much more tolerant about age and more receptive to the benefits and tradeoffs of both youth and, erm.., "experience" (said tongue-in-cheek because age does not necessarily equate to experience)

Sounds believable, but how many people successfully transition into those?

Re: Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

#418
post #269
post #253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Broadly the same" and averages don't work well when you're talking about a very specific sub population that would, necessarily, be picked from the few at the top end of the intelligence distribution.

We’re talking about men and women. Approximately 50% each of humankind. Hardly “very specific sub populations”

No, please see the context/comment chain that this comment exists in. We're talking about hiring in tech. The average person doesn't apply to, get hired for, or succeed in, tech positions. Most tech positions require a higher degree because most tech (programming, computer science, hardware engineering, etc) requires or directly benefits from that higher degree. Those that hold those higher degrees have an above average intelligence. Those with the highest intelligence usually having the most success in the technical part of the tech workforce. Tech prefers the higher side of the intelligence distribution, because it's hard.

Re: Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

#419
post #252

Anecdotally I have seen this in person at a large tech startup. The recruiting team was all women, mainly white, and they were incredibly cliquey. Every hire was a woman. Men were turned down with vague excuses like “not a culture fit.” All while aggressively pushing DEI initiatives and interventions on the tech side. I don’t think the irony of this ever crossed their minds.

Read the summary. The finding was driven by female-dominated professions. Presumably things like teaching or nursing. Definitely not tech. Research was also done only in Sweden. I've never seen a US tech company that wasn't overwhelmingly white and male.

[deleted]

Re: Hiring discrimination: a problem for men in female-dominated occupations

#420
post #184

There are very concerning patterns developing at the moment in the DEI space. DEI efforts, and often those leading them, are increasingly the most biased and close minded parts of the organization. Spreading selected stereotypes and often solving concerns about “discrimination” by being very biased and inequitable. For example at my last company a report showed that slightly fewer of a certain minority were promoted.…

Got hired at a place that apparently only hired anything except white men. Unless they were non cis.

Apparently an exception was made in my case because they were absolutely desperate for someone qualified to do the work.

Company meetings were mostly just complaining about straight white males. Figuring out ways to force the males to do extra work to make up for… I don’t even know. Mocking their own customers constantly based on same.

Most toxic bigoted place I’ve ever been. That’s when I became aware of how dangerous woke culture was.

Grew up thinking to treat everyone as equals. Now I’m (nasty words) for that.

Fixed their technical issues and left fast as I could.

Post reply on HN