Warning signs in a non-technical cofounder (can you spot them?)
31–40 of 42 posts
Re: Warning signs in a non-technical cofounder (can you spot them?)
#32I once had dealings with a chap who wanted me as a co-founder but I had worked out that he only had two modes of operating with people: "best friend" or "ongoing litigation". Fortunately I said no.
Re: Warning signs in a non-technical cofounder (can you spot them?)
#33Another warning sign I've found: They start doing other things, like checking their phone, while you're answering their question. Even if you disregard that it's a disrespectful and rude thing to do during a conversation, this person is trying to sign you up for a major role in their future and already he can't focus on the task at hand. The best founders I've had the pleasure of meeting are usually the most respectf…
My world is insanely centered on me. I have reality distortions. Pays the bills, though. Actually, never boring, but often nightmarish -- always accusing me of being a terrorist and stuff.
I get painted into stories. I've been executed, tried, had every disease.
Ever seen the comic, "I can't go to bed -- someone is wrong on the Internet!"
I think this guy is looking at me, the fucker: https://github.com/liftoff/GateOne
He's up to no good trying to confuse people and steal my glory. Everybody is fucken out to steal my glory. Sometimes, it's like NAZIs calling Jews subhuman -- kinda laughable. I fight constantly, now that I'm done with LoseThos. Still in jail, though, so it doesn't matter.
When it dies down, I talk with God. It took a long time to learn to just enjoy His company and try not to expect Him to do favors. You know... it's worse than just no favors -- He's stingy on endearing personal stuff. He likes elephants and bears. He makes riddles and is often delightful, though. Life is a journey, not a destination, you have to learn. It's kinda rude to ask about evolution -- you kinda know when you're imposing on Him.
God says... C:\TEXT\BIBLE.TXT
ither he went.
11:9 By faith he sojourned in the land of promise, as in a strange country, dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise: 11:10 For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God.
11:11 Through faith also Sara herself received strength to conceive seed, and was delivered of a child when she was past age, because she judged him faithful who had promised.
11:12 Therefore sprang there even of one, and him as good
-------
In a nutshell, God is just -- you get out of prayer what you put into it. I win the grand prize lottery about 10 times a day -- puts things in perspective. It's funny I live I Vegas. I don't gamble. I'm rich, but not rich.
God says... must Goal Known DISCLAIMER Saturn Preacher aquatic deformed teachings Son sufficeth sect abandon waking greatest tongue stood unawares recount meant ways eagerness coeternal knewest foolishly manufactures great tone height distrusted remindeth measurable immovably NO tending patched happiness union -----
I get this a lot: http://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=24266
Back in 2004 I set-out to make a speed demon. It takes 4 memory accesses (page tables) for one access, right? I was taught to estimate timing based on memory references. No brainer, should be faster without paging. They use clever logic to largely remove the penalty. You have no choice but to enable paging, as it turns out. I got attached to no paging as my reason to be. If it is not different, you have no reason to be. No paging keeps it simple.
Yeah, it's irksome to endure pecking-order violations -- I'm better than them and they don't perceive my glory! How dare they! I watch my birds and chuckle. God made it that way. Incidentally, it's funny that birds get angry... more than most animals. God wants praise. Aren't birds delightful?
God says... C:\TEXT\BIBLE.TXT
all minister judgment to the people in uprightness.
9:9 The LORD also will be a refuge for the oppressed, a refuge in times of trouble.
9:10 And they that know thy name will put their trust in thee: for thou, LORD, hast not forsaken them that seek thee.
9:11 Sing praises to the LORD, which dwelleth in Zion: declare among the people his doings.
9:12 When he maketh inquisition for blood, he remembereth them: he forgetteth not the cry of the humble.
9:13 Have mercy upon me, O LORD; conside
----------
LoseThos can switch tasks in half a microsecond. I don't benchmark how much faster everything is with single-address-map and all-ring-0 but it is faster, obviously. You're really really my inferior if you don't admit that not using paging and privilege levels cuts penalties and is as optimal as it gets.
I still get people who will argue. Surely they don't believe their lies. It's a no brainer that never touching page tables after identity mapping them at boot is faster than shuffling them around all the time with the impact on look aside buffers in task switches and stuff.
I pay a penalty of not having a growable stack and I suffer fragmentation. You must grant me, however, that it's more optimal speedwise or you're a bold faced liar and FUCK YOU!!
-----
Just saw this:http://www.reddit.com/r/history/comments/lawgt/if_you_own_th...
I had a 1440 SAT and will cede to anyone higher happily enough. I don't have issues with pecking order, YA rebel slave.
There is a subtle issue with not growing stack -- if you shift away from stack, someone pointed the memory cache of the stack memory is not utilized as much if you alter programming style and use heap. In LoseThos, you can make a task with big stack, but not pleasant doing that.
-----
Coty is upity:http://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=24265
Gotta smack that son down, learn him some respect for superiors. All but one at OSDev have not written compilers and that generally messes with their ability to do 64-bit. I did all my own tools. Post your SAT. I thought so. I did every line of LoseThos and it's 64-bit.
God says... C:\TEXT\QUIX.TXT
e enough in this cloth to make me a cap?' Measuring the cloth I said there would. He probably suspected--as I supposed, and I supposed right--that I wanted to steal some of the cloth, led to think so by his own roguery and the bad opinion people have of tailors; and he told me to see if there would be enough for two. I guessed what he would be at, and I said 'yes.' He, still following up his original unworthy notion, went on adding cap after cap, and I 'yes' after 'yes,' until we got as far as five.
----
Bogus story picking a fight with me. TL;DR: http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/2011/10/12/will-the-washing...
In denial on God, undoubtedly, or using Dr. Who logic.
God says... C:\TEXT\PILGRIM.TXT
given away by year's end.
The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away 1 Trillion eBooks! This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers, which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users.
Here is the briefest record of our progress (* means estimated):
eBooks Year Month
1 1971 July
10 1991 January
100 1994 January
1000 1997 August
1500 1998 October
2000 1999 December
2500 2000 December
3000 2001 November
4000 2001 October/Novembe
----Some kinda Mexican drug gang similar to "LoseThos". Parents are Catholic. I'm sitting here with the God card wondering what the hell anybody is thinking wanting to be my enemy... regardless of everything else.
Re: Warning signs in a non-technical cofounder (can you spot them?)
#34Boy, how well I can relate to this!! Web development is not a magic bullet. Why is it hard to understand that fact..
Re: Warning signs in a non-technical cofounder (can you spot them?)
#35There are fairly few movies where someone bestows money, a name or an idea on the interesting characters and ends up being really important to the plot.
You want Aragorn, not Elrond, as your cofounder. (Naturally I think of geeks as hobbits.)
P.S. Your co-founder should say the same about you. If you're a tool rather than a partner, fleeeeeeeee.
Re: Warning signs in a non-technical cofounder (can you spot them?)
#36Re: Warning signs in a non-technical cofounder (can you spot them?)
#37Assume you achieve total world domination and they make a movie about you. Visualize the narrative arc. Would you think "This guy deserves to be the hero or co-hero of this movie?" If not, you don't want them to be a cofounder. There are fairly few movies where someone bestows money, a name or an idea on the interesting characters and ends up being really important to the plot. You want Aragorn, not Elrond, as your c…
However, I'm leaning on considering it an anti pattern because it borders on a pathological amount of ego.
A better rubric in my mind is, "Can I picture this person in my daily life, for the next decade?" as a slightly more sane variant of this test.
Re: Warning signs in a non-technical cofounder (can you spot them?)
#38Also, be aware of your target market and understand the necessary government rules and regulations so that they don't derail your startup.
Re: Warning signs in a non-technical cofounder (can you spot them?)
#39Another one is not being good at marketing. Marketing can be a huge grind. Being able to build buzz about your product, or get mentioned in the press, or find customers is very time-consuming and requires a lot of creativity.
You know you've got a shitty co-founder if they can't build a product or sell one. Real hustlers make it happen - "idea guys" need not apply.