Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
gist.github.com
Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
1–10 of 319 posts
Re: Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
#2This discussion about whether a game engine is long-term supportable, whether it invests back in the gamedev, it parallels the conversation about development-experience in operating systems so closely.
Re: Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
#3Re: Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
#4> > what is the point of Unity, now?
> Unity was good for prototyping. Access to Unreal engine source is great.
Doesn't sound they are making much of an argument to redeem Unity.
Re: Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
#5Also, is UE something to consider for 2D games? Or is Godot more the pick there?
Re: Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
#6Re: Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
#7Re: Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
#8Old Unity would never have shipped a fiasco like URP. They'd have figured out a way to make incremental migration possible instead of having a global setting... I refuse to believe this would even be particularly difficult.
Re: Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
#9I've worked with Unreal and Unity both, professionally and for many years. Several triple A games, indie titles, commercial sims, and social experiences. What sets unity apart by leaps and bounds is its asset store, community and educational materials.
Re: Unreal vs. Unity Opinion
#10I've worked with Unreal and Unity both, professionally and for many years. Several triple A games, indie titles, commercial sims, and social experiences. What sets unity apart by leaps and bounds is its asset store, community and educational materials.