And then there's the inherit issue of a restricted social network being disadvantaged in competition with other networks. If you limit the use or the reach of a social network, other networks who have more use and reach will grow faster. The reason the current major social networks are full of noise and over-engagement is not because people necessarily like that more or that other alternatives hasn't existed. It's because they won in the inevitable darwinistic battle a social network will join, where maximum reach and volume of content are key advantages.
Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
291–300 of 391 posts
Re: Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
#292Re: Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
#293Re: Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
#294Re: Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
#295Hey everyone, OP here. I, like many others tend to waffle between loving and hating social media, so this is my take on what I think a better solution looks like. This is something I've been working on for the past couple of months and a concept that I think will be though provoking, if nothing else, to the HN community. If you want to read more on my thoughts and the story behind this, you can check out my blog post…
Re: Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
#296Hey everyone, OP here. I, like many others tend to waffle between loving and hating social media, so this is my take on what I think a better solution looks like. This is something I've been working on for the past couple of months and a concept that I think will be though provoking, if nothing else, to the HN community. If you want to read more on my thoughts and the story behind this, you can check out my blog post…
Re: Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
#297Constrained social networks don't work, look at Google+. You don't need a social network to stay in touch with your friends and family as messaging apps and e-mail fulfil that purpose completely. Algorithms are not the only reason why all social networks drift towards celebrity/influencer/news following -- they are channels for consuming media, the "social" is in the name only.
Re: Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looks great and love the concept. What’s the tech stack behind it?
I'm using Supabase, Sveltekit, Tailwind, SendGrid, and Netlify. SvelteKit has been a lot of fun but definitely has a few rough edges. Supabase has been awesome, but as you can probably see, from the comments elsewhere, has some kinks around magic link based authentication.
Re: Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
#299Constrained social networks don't work, look at Google+. You don't need a social network to stay in touch with your friends and family as messaging apps and e-mail fulfil that purpose completely. Algorithms are not the only reason why all social networks drift towards celebrity/influencer/news following -- they are channels for consuming media, the "social" is in the name only.
The first tranch of social networks (Friendster, Friends Reunited, MySpace, etc) were very much based on people keeping up to date with their friends. They worked quite well for users , but were hard to monetize succeasfully. There was value there, but not much in the way of ideas about how to extract it besides sticking a skyscraper ad down the side. I don't see any reason not to try that model again. Maybe it'll wo…
Re: Show HN: Slow Social, a social network built for friends, not influencers
#300> …products owned by publicly traded companies who have a legally binding responsibility to maximize financial return on investment to their shareholders.
Can someone enlighten me to this particular detail? How come legally? I believed it was free market?