Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280

#1

Post by quickthrowman » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 7:40 PM UTC

Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280
coindesk.com

Re: Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280

#2

Post by theandrewbailey » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 7:53 PM UTC

NFTs are the diamond jewelery of the internet: extremely pricey, limited usefulness, and impossible to recoup your "investment" on second hand markets.

Re: Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280

#3

Post by jpt1 » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 8:25 PM UTC

He should accept the offer, it’s probably $280 more than the NFT is worth.

Re: Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280

#4

Post by smt88 » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 8:28 PM UTC

theandrewbailey wrote: post #2

NFTs are the diamond jewelery of the internet: extremely pricey, limited usefulness, and impossible to recoup your "investment" on second hand markets.

Diamonds at least have industrial uses. NFTs don't even have an intrinsic value.

Re: Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280

#5

Post by jethronethro » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 8:30 PM UTC

theandrewbailey wrote: post #2

NFTs are the diamond jewelery of the internet: extremely pricey, limited usefulness, and impossible to recoup your "investment" on second hand markets.

Diamond jewelry? More like cubic zirconia ...

Re: Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280

#6

Post by mythrwy » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 9:01 PM UTC

jethronethro wrote: post #5

theandrewbailey wrote: post #2

NFTs are the diamond jewelery of the internet: extremely pricey, limited usefulness, and impossible to recoup your "investment" on second hand markets.

Diamond jewelry? More like cubic zirconia ...

More like a paper saying you own a cubic zirconia even though you don't and can't actually posses it.

Re: Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280

#7

Post by labrador » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 10:30 PM UTC

Sina Estavi should've bought land on the Moon instead

https://lunarregistry.com/

Re: Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280

#8

Post by aaaaaaaaata » Thu, Apr 14, 2022, 1:19 AM UTC

smt88 wrote: post #4

theandrewbailey wrote: post #2

NFTs are the diamond jewelery of the internet: extremely pricey, limited usefulness, and impossible to recoup your "investment" on second hand markets.

Diamonds at least have industrial uses. NFTs don't even have an intrinsic value.

Neither does a meter-tall Mercedes badge, but they keep selling vehicles in North America.

Re: Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280

#9

Post by onion2k » Thu, Apr 14, 2022, 7:22 AM UTC

smt88 wrote: post #4

theandrewbailey wrote: post #2

NFTs are the diamond jewelery of the internet: extremely pricey, limited usefulness, and impossible to recoup your "investment" on second hand markets.

Diamonds at least have industrial uses. NFTs don't even have an intrinsic value.

Diamonds at least have industrial uses.

The 'gemstone quality' diamonds that end up in jewellery have no purpose apart from looking nice.

I suppose you could crush them to get something useful.

Re: Jack Dorsey First Tweet NFT listed for $48M, ends with best offer of $280

#10

Post by barrad0s » Thu, Apr 14, 2022, 4:10 PM UTC

jpt1 wrote: post #3

He should accept the offer, it’s probably $280 more than the NFT is worth.

haha exactly!