Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's cool that you do that, but "Doesn't everyone?" implies to me that you might be a bit out of touch. This is common among a certain type of person and unheard of for everybody else.
Not to cast shade on you, by any means, but if you're an engineer (which I think is the implied everyone,) I'm surprised you don't!
Ask HN: Have you created programs for only your personal use?
411–420 of 671 posts
Re: Ask HN: Have you created programs for only your personal use?
#412Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's cool that you do that, but "Doesn't everyone?" implies to me that you might be a bit out of touch. This is common among a certain type of person and unheard of for everybody else.
> This is common among a certain type of person and unheard of for everybody else. I suspect the venn diagram of that is very close to the venn diagram of hn readers and everybody else. I think "doesn't everyone here" is implied there.
Re: Ask HN: Have you created programs for only your personal use?
#413Re: Ask HN: Have you created programs for only your personal use?
#414Earlier quoted context omitted.
It depends on what your baseline is. With knowledge of the generation algorithm, a dictionary attack on a password generated that way will definitely succeed, but on average it will take 2⁸³ tries (twice that at worst). At a billion tries per second this is 300 million years, almost long enough for the Sun to engulf the Earth if your attacker devotes only a single CPU to the task. There are commonly used password has…
In short, oodles of noodles is a better chew than fewer, stranger noodles in your alphabet soup.
Re: Ask HN: Have you created programs for only your personal use?
#415I created a kahoot quiz generator. It grabs random questions with 4 answers (one of which is correct) from an open question database and outputs a special kahoot compatible excel sheet ready to be imported into kahoot.
Re: Ask HN: Have you created programs for only your personal use?
#416I also made a custom debugging print function to print variable names as well as their value with only having to write "print(var)". It also will print the parent function and class names for context. I use this tool more than the debugger day to day now.
I know there are existing alternatives for one or both of these but there's nothing easier than tweaking a tool you wrote yourself. Plus I learned a lot about Python in the process!
Re: Ask HN: Have you created programs for only your personal use?
#417Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not to cast shade on you, by any means, but if you're an engineer (which I think is the implied everyone,) I'm surprised you don't!
Yeah, I'm an engineer. I'd guess that neither I nor most of my coworkers do. It's much more common amongst lower-level engineers than, say, product engineers. Heck, I work full time in Python + Typescript and I don't even know Bash. I never even have things I want to script. Most of my time is spent making sense of code, not doing any sort of complicated repeatable task.
Re: Ask HN: Have you created programs for only your personal use?
#418Re: Ask HN: Have you created programs for only your personal use?
#419Not really a program, but I put a script on aws that texts me in the morning if it’s a street sweeping day. Sometimes I forget to move my car anyway…