U+237C ⍼ Right Angle with Downwards Zigzag Arrow

Post by sodapopcan » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 12:27 PM UTC

jorvi wrote: post #55

vletal wrote: post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I do not get it. Did you have to shut it down? Does not make sense to complain that someone uploaded stuff to a public unprotected writable storage. Wouldn't securing it with a set of credentials suffice?

Sometimes people should be able to do nice things without it getting abused, no? In The Netherlands, in the nicer neighborhoods we have something called a ‘buurtbieb’ aka a ‘neighborhood libraries’, which is a weatherproof cabinet where people can put surplus books that other people in the neighborhood can borrow. Of course you could take all the books or use the cabinet to store candy, but why would you?

Post by cygx » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 12:29 PM UTC

BaRRaKID wrote: post #56

blacklion wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand, why Unicode must (should?) contain superscript and subscript glyphes at all. Declared goal of Unicode is to have encoding of all characters used by all languages, past and modern. Subscript and superscript are not used by any language as separate characters, it is typesetting property. It should be solved by other means, not by character/glyph encoding. Should Unicode include ALL characters strike…

This is probably an edge case, but I work in lab software that uses chemical symbols and having sub and super characters saves lots of headaches. I can just store "CO₂" in a database, query it, and display it back as a simple string, or display values in scientific notation like 1,3×10³, without having to use any formatting. But to be honest I'm not sure what the parent comment wants to see added because at the momen…

Post by Jarmsie » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 12:31 PM UTC

lifthrasiir wrote: post #19

rich_sasha wrote: post #15

Might we run out of Unicode code points, like we (seem to) be running out of IPv4 addresses? As another comment mentions, once you add all these snowmen, with/without snow, male female and gender-neutral, in a few skin colour options (plus neutral)... it adds up. Plus, exponential growth once you consider family of snowmen (different number/genders/races of "parents", different number/gender/races of "children" and s…

There is no reason to believe the current rate (about ~35,000 over the period 2010--2020) to change rapidly, so we are probably safe for this century. You should be aware that emoji gender and skin color is encoded in character sequences and modifiers rather than atomic characters, exactly in order to avoid that exponential growth. And in the unlikely case that Unicode gets so many characters somehow, you can always…

Post by rcarmo » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 12:32 PM UTC

bamboozled wrote: post #7

These unicode characters feel like they were given to us from an alien species or something. How did it we end up with so many characters of unknown origin? I had no idea what it meant or was used for, thus assigned it a “descriptive name” when collating the symbols for the STIX project. (I still have no idea, nor can supply an example of the symbol in use.) […] it is the case that ISO 9573-13 existed long before eit…

Post by beowulfey » Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 12:34 PM UTC

hardware2win wrote: post #67

mbeex wrote: post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think, you don't get the full grasp of "early, friendly internet". Very few people do today. In my bubble - programming, for example, young people can't even imagine that there were times when you could focus on _things_ instead of writing layers of security code around them.

I think you make it sound as if that was good, but it was straight naive or irresponsible