Shine: A super fast fixed-point MP3 encoder
1–10 of 44 posts
Re: Shine: A super fast fixed-point MP3 encoder
#2Re: Shine: A super fast fixed-point MP3 encoder
#3Re: Shine: A super fast fixed-point MP3 encoder
#4I've used minimp3 to implement a MP3 player on a STM32 microcontroller. Works great -- it has no problem playing a 256kbps file at 80 MHz. :)
Re: Shine: A super fast fixed-point MP3 encoder
#5Shine's output doesn't sound great. If you need the performance on embedded hardware, that's what it's there for. If you need quality sound and can't afford to crank up the output bitrate, prepare to be disappointed.
Re: Shine: A super fast fixed-point MP3 encoder
#6You can use Opus or AAC, even most car systems should work with one of them.
Re: Shine: A super fast fixed-point MP3 encoder
#7And for the other direction, there's minimp3: https://github.com/lieff/minimp3 I've used minimp3 to implement a MP3 player on a STM32 microcontroller. Works great -- it has no problem playing a 256kbps file at 80 MHz. :)
Re: Shine: A super fast fixed-point MP3 encoder
#8Why do people insist on still using MP3, when better stuff is available? YouTube hasn't used MP3 for years, with good reason. You can use Opus or AAC, even most car systems should work with one of them.
Re: Shine: A super fast fixed-point MP3 encoder
#9Why do people insist on still using MP3, when better stuff is available? YouTube hasn't used MP3 for years, with good reason. You can use Opus or AAC, even most car systems should work with one of them.
Re: Shine: A super fast fixed-point MP3 encoder
#10Why do people insist on still using MP3, when better stuff is available? YouTube hasn't used MP3 for years, with good reason. You can use Opus or AAC, even most car systems should work with one of them.
TLDR: for Youtube, transit bw is expensive and rapidly evolving codec cornucopia is cheap enough to cover with the bw savings.