New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
1–10 of 223 posts
Re: New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
#2Re: New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
#3Quoted post unavailable.
Re: New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
#4Re: New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
#5Quoted post unavailable.
Re: New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
#6If so, I wonder why one would name his/her company after their competitor's founder.
Re: New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
#7Quoted post unavailable.
The bigger question is, does it violate any patents? Not necessarily intentionally, but because there's only so many ways you can build a GPU and (almost) all of them are patented already. Apple themselves failed to build a GPU from the ground up, so it's actually difficult.
The GeForce 4 is 20 years old at this point, and many newer technologies are going to have significantly older patents.
Re: New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
The bigger question is, does it violate any patents? Not necessarily intentionally, but because there's only so many ways you can build a GPU and (almost) all of them are patented already. Apple themselves failed to build a GPU from the ground up, so it's actually difficult.
Many of those core GPU patients must be expiring right now. The GeForce 4 is 20 years old at this point, and many newer technologies are going to have significantly older patents.
Re: New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
#9Is "Moore" of the company's name is the "Moore" of Moore's law? If so, I wonder why one would name his/her company after their competitor's founder.
Re: New Chinese GPU Maker Moore Threads Unveils the MTT S60 GPU
#10Quoted post unavailable.
The bigger question is, does it violate any patents? Not necessarily intentionally, but because there's only so many ways you can build a GPU and (almost) all of them are patented already. Apple themselves failed to build a GPU from the ground up, so it's actually difficult.
> The bigger question is, does it violate any patents?
The former implies the latter.
On the other hand if the IP isn't stolen but would still fall afoul of the patent then I would argue that the patent is wrongly provided. Patents don't exist to protect obvious implementations.
I'm not a lawyer but we all know patent law is all kinds of fucked up.