Live data from Hacker News

Super Simple Storage Service

supersimplestorageservice.com

31–40 of 166 posts

Re: Super Simple Storage Service

#36

I believe they have overestimated the cost of using 3.5" floppies, probably to make themselves look better by comparison. They give the cost as $211,172, but that's the cost to buy a 1 TiB pack of floppies. Their own storage cost is per-month, so to get the equivalent cost for floppies you need to also divide by the expected useful lifetime of a floppy disk. I did a web search for "floppy disk lifetime" and the inter…

Since we have multiple points of data for lifespan, perhaps we should be computing a weighted average between them?

Going by gut feel: 3-5 years sounds like "pretty likely", let's give that 95% of the weight, at 4 years for simplicity. 10-20 years would be nice, but really, how much tech lasts that long? Not much. How about 4.9999999% at 15 years. And the remaining can go to "indefinitely", which seems pretty darn unlikely, so it has 0.0000001% weight.

(4*95+15*4.9999999+∞*0.0000001 / 100) = ∞

I guess we can ignore the monthly cost ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I applied weights to things, so this is Bayesian, and we all know that's always right.

Re: Super Simple Storage Service

#37
Fact check: The cost of S3 standard storage per TB is approximately $23 not $153. S3 standard storage, the most expensive kind, is $.021-.023 per GB.

S4 costs about the same as S3 Deep Archive storage.

Update: The article appears to be a joke. That aside, there are no cost savings against S3 Deep Archive; additionally S3 Deep Archive supports restores unlike the write-only S4.

Re: Super Simple Storage Service

#38
post #24

The API does not provide any means for deleting the uploaded data. Also, there is no durability guarantee. This service looks like a scam.

> S4's state-of-the-art write-only interface removes the headaches commonly associated with reading data.

Durability is one of the headaches you can ignore with a write only interface.

Post reply on HN