91–93 of 93 posts
Remember the advice of "How to read a patent in 60 seconds" [0]. In this case there are two very short independent claims (1 and 3), all the way at the last page. They both seem to just be talking of some specifics on cache coherency. [0] https://www.danshapiro.com/blog/2010/09/how-to-read-a-patent...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The “NAL” statement wasn’t necessary: it was totally obvious the moment you wrote “definitely.” There’s a 99.999% certainty that this non-issue will NOT result in a lawsuit.
Gonna NAL anytime it comes to such subjects. ;) Amazon has a full team of patent lawyers on retainer just to submit a patent.
So does any larger tech company, no?
Underfox writes:
>Now that a sufficient amount of time has passed and I have collected a sufficient amount of data, let's explain today's social experiment.
>For those who don't know, in addition to my work with telecommunications, I'm also involved in researching complex networks, where among many lines of research is the way information propagates in social networks.
>With the data obtained today, I was able to help a great friend with his research and, at the same time, show how technology information is misinterpreted and why filtering is so necessary.